The Congress, which has in the recent period been in
denial on the issue of corruption and has been loathe to act on it
unless forced by the courts, is demonstrating an election-eve resolve to
do the right thing, on being prodded by the leader. Congress
vice-president Rahul Gandhi has forced the Maharashtra government to
reconsider its decision to reject a judicial enquiry report into the
Adarsh housing society scam. From the time he held an impromptu press
conference to advise the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government
against going ahead with a controversial ordinance to nullify the
Supreme Court verdict on automatic disqualification of convicted
legislators, Mr. Gandhi has sought to create for himself what seems to
be the only available space for public morality within the party, even
on matters concerning governments run by it. Before the Lokpal Bill was
passed in
Parliament, he held forth on the need to display seriousness
in fighting corruption, and he has now administered a rebuke to the
Congress-led Maharashtra government over its controversial decision.
There was a time in the earlier phase of the UPA regime at the Centre —
the appointment of P.J. Thomas as Central Vigilance Commissioner and the
2G spectrum allocation process are telling examples — when the
government would unmistakably choose the wrong course of action and
brazen it out until the superior judiciary intervened. The pattern has
slightly changed now, with Mr. Gandhi casting himself in the role of the
party’s conscience-keeper.
When the party leadership
goads its governments to observe higher standards of conduct, the
outcome — the dropping of the Ordinance to protect convicted MPs, for
instance — is certainly to be welcomed. Yet, the truth is that the
Congress does not seem to have many who would choose to act against
corruption, when the alternatives of denial and cover-up are available.
Mr. Gandhi by himself does not seem to have had any salutary effect on
governance and is able to intervene only belatedly. As the opposition
has pointed out, he had little to say in the past on the Commonwealth
Games or coal block allocation scams. And the Ordinance amending the
Prevention of Corruption Act had been sent to the President for approval
before he dismissed it as ‘nonsense’. Mr. Gandhi’s intervention,
laudable though it may be, will not be enough to rid the Congress of its
image as a party prone to denying or covering up wrongdoing. The party
needs to internalise the message of the recent electoral outcomes that
speak of the need for an alternative political culture. Its leaders need
moral fibre of their own and should not expect correctives to be handed
down through its leader’s selective and sporadic interventions.
Comments
Post a Comment