Skip to main content

A predictable pattern

The Congress, which has in the recent period been in denial on the issue of corruption and has been loathe to act on it unless forced by the courts, is demonstrating an election-eve resolve to do the right thing, on being prodded by the leader. Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi has forced the Maharashtra government to reconsider its decision to reject a judicial enquiry report into the Adarsh housing society scam. From the time he held an impromptu press conference to advise the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government against going ahead with a controversial ordinance to nullify the Supreme Court verdict on automatic disqualification of convicted legislators, Mr. Gandhi has sought to create for himself what seems to be the only available space for public morality within the party, even on matters concerning governments run by it. Before the Lokpal Bill was passed in
Parliament, he held forth on the need to display seriousness in fighting corruption, and he has now administered a rebuke to the Congress-led Maharashtra government over its controversial decision. There was a time in the earlier phase of the UPA regime at the Centre — the appointment of P.J. Thomas as Central Vigilance Commissioner and the 2G spectrum allocation process are telling examples — when the government would unmistakably choose the wrong course of action and brazen it out until the superior judiciary intervened. The pattern has slightly changed now, with Mr. Gandhi casting himself in the role of the party’s conscience-keeper.
When the party leadership goads its governments to observe higher standards of conduct, the outcome — the dropping of the Ordinance to protect convicted MPs, for instance — is certainly to be welcomed. Yet, the truth is that the Congress does not seem to have many who would choose to act against corruption, when the alternatives of denial and cover-up are available. Mr. Gandhi by himself does not seem to have had any salutary effect on governance and is able to intervene only belatedly. As the opposition has pointed out, he had little to say in the past on the Commonwealth Games or coal block allocation scams. And the Ordinance amending the Prevention of Corruption Act had been sent to the President for approval before he dismissed it as ‘nonsense’. Mr. Gandhi’s intervention, laudable though it may be, will not be enough to rid the Congress of its image as a party prone to denying or covering up wrongdoing. The party needs to internalise the message of the recent electoral outcomes that speak of the need for an alternative political culture. Its leaders need moral fibre of their own and should not expect correctives to be handed down through its leader’s selective and sporadic interventions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”. The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya. It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests. The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach i...

What's ailing Namami Gange programme?(DTE)

Winters are extremely hectic for Sushma Patel, a vegetable grower in Uttar Pradesh’s Chunar town. Her farm is in the fertile plains of Ganga where people grow three crops a year. But this is the only season when she can grow vegetables. And before that, she needs to manually dig out shreds of plastic and wrappers from her one-hectare (ha) farm. “This is all because of the nullah,” she says, pointing at an open drain that runs through her field, carrying sewage from the neighbourhood to the Ganga. “Every monsoon, the drain overflows and inundates the field with a thick, black sludge and plastic debris. We cannot even go near the field as the stench of sewage fills the air,” she says. But Patel has no one to complain to as this is the way of life for most people in this ancient town. About 70 per cent of the people in Chunar depend on toilets that have on-site sanitation, such as septic tanks and pits. In the absence of a proper disposal or management system, people simply dump the faec...

"ISRO has capabilities to build geostationary satellites for air quality monitoring” (downtoearth)

Pawan Gupta's findings on trans-boundary movement of pollution (Punjab to Delhi) from biomass burning in 2015 spurred debates. He participated in discussions with Indian regulators early September at the Better Air Quality Conference in Busan on the advantages of using satellite data for air quality monitoring. He explains to Down to Earth how air quality monitoring is done using satellite data. How is satellite data used to measure air pollution? Satellites that provide information on atmospheric pollutants are normally (not always) in the low earth orbits (400-1000 km above the Earth’s surface). A single satellite can carry one or more remote sensing instruments onboard that look down to earth and obtain information about the object in the field of view of satellite sensor. The Earth receives electromagnetic radiation from the sun, which travels through space and reaches the earth-atmosphere system. The radiation then interacts with the Earth’s atmosphere and the surface...