Skip to main content

Dikshitars’ right to manage Natarajar temple cannot be taken away: SC

The Supreme Court on Monday quashed the Tamil Nadu government’s February 2009 order appointing Executive Officer to manage the affairs and properties of the  Natarajar temple at Chidambaram.
A Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and S.A. Bobde, allowing a batch of appeals filed by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy and Podu Dikshitars against a Madras High Court upholding the GO, held that the right of Dikshitars to manage the temple could not taken away by the government.

The Bench accepted the contention of Podu Dikshitars, that they were a religious denomination as per Article 26 of the Constitution “which guarantees right to establish and maintain institutions for religious purposes.”
Writing the judgment, Justice Chauhan pointed out that the right to administer the temple by the Dikshitars had been recognised by the Supreme Court in its judgment in 1952 and it could not be taken away. .
The bench faulted the Madras High Court for re-opening the issue whether Podu Dikshitars were a religious denomination or not even after the matter had been res judicata (already been decided).
On the State government’s contention that it had a right to interfere when there was mismanagement, the bench said such interference could only be for a short period .
Quoting the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, Dr. Swamy argued that if there were allegations of misappropriation, it should be dealt with under the provisions of IPC and not by taking over the temple administration.
On cloud nine
A.V. Ragunathan from Cuddalore writes: The Supreme Court verdict has brought cheer to the Podhu Dikshithars and devotees.
They celebrated the verdict by bursting firecrackers on the outer prahara of the temple. As the news of the judgment started trickling in, the dikshithars assembled in front of the temple to congratulate each other over the turn of event.
Nagaswaram and thavil vidwans recited “Mallari” raagam, usually performed when the presiding deity is being taken out in a procession, to succinctly convey their joy.
Secretary of the Podhu Dikshithars’ Association Kasiraja Dikshithar, told The Hindu that “Lord Nataraja has bestowed the victory upon the Dikshithars.”
The Dikshithars said that ever since the State government took over the temple in 2009, they had been taking various measures to retrieve the temple.
The Madras High Court had rejected their petitions twice and finally, they along with Bharatiya Janata Party leader Subramanian Swamy, filed a case in the Supreme Court which had established the “denomination factor” and hence, restored their rights, which they enjoyed for hundreds of years, over the management of the temple.
Historic symbol
Chidambaram MLA K. Balakrishnan told The Hindu that the rights of the Dikshithars in conducting the rituals and temple functions were never in dispute.
In restoring their so-called lost rights what was lost sight of was the role of the State government in temple administration.
He said “Natarajar temple should not be viewed just as a place of worship. It is a cherished cultural heritage and a historic symbol.
Former Minister V.V. Swaminathan said the government should pass a special legislation to keep the temple under its control.
State coordinator of the Manitha Urimai Padhukappu Maiyam members courted arrest by holding an agitation against the verdict.
Quashes Tamil Nadu government’s order appointing executive officer

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NGT terminates chairmen of pollution control boards in 10 states (downtoearth,)

Cracking the whip on 10 State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) for ad-hoc appointments, the National Green Tribunal has ordered the termination of Chairpersons of these regulatory authorities. The concerned states are Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Kerala, Rajasthan, Telangana, Haryana, Maharashtra and Manipur. The order was given last week by the principal bench of the NGT, chaired by Justice Swatanter Kumar. The recent order of June 8, 2017, comes as a follow-up to an NGT judgment given in August 2016. In that judgment, the NGT had issued directions on appointments of Chairmen and Member Secretaries of the SPCBs, emphasising on crucial roles they have in pollution control and abatement. It then specified required qualifications as well as tenure of the authorities. States were required to act on the orders within three months and frame Rules for appointment [See Box: Highlights of the NGT judgment of 2016 on criteria for SPCB chairperson appointment]. Having ...

High dose of Vitamin C and B3 can kill colon cancer cells: study (downtoearth)

In a first, a team of researchers has found that high doses of Vitamin C and niacin or Vitamin B3 can kill cancer stem cells. A study published in Cell Biology International showed the opposing effects of low and high dose of vitamin C and vitamin B3 on colon cancer stem cells. Led by Bipasha Bose and Sudheer Shenoy, the team found that while low doses (5-25 micromolar) of Vitamin C and B3 proliferate colon cancer stem cells, high doses (100 to 1,000 micromolar) killed cancer stem cells. Such high doses of vitamins can only be achieved through intravenous injections in colon cancer patients. The third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, colon cancer can be prevented by an intake of dietary fibre and lifestyle changes. While the next step of the researchers is to delineate the mechanisms involved in such opposing effects, they also hope to establish a therapeutic dose of Vitamin C and B3 for colon cancer stem cell therapy. “If the therapeutic dose gets validated under in vivo...

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”. The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya. It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests. The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach i...