Skip to main content

Ministry’s new norms may kill rivers

The relaxed norms for river sand-mining may kill the rivers of Kerala, besides reducing the availability of drinking water.
The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has done away with the norm of environment clearance for river sand-mining for sites below the extent of five hectares. Sites with a mining lease area between five hectares and 25 hectares would be appraised on the basis of a pre-feasibility report and an application in the prescribed format, it said.
The decision will have far-reaching consequences in Kerala, where rivers have been exploited to the hilt. As all sand-mining areas in Kerala are below five hectares, the new order would impact States such as Kerala most, according to those in the sector.
Mining plan

The MoEF order also suggests that mining should be done manually to a depth of five metres or water level, whichever is less. In case of mining near bridges or embankments, a safety zone should be marked where no mining would be permitted. The mining plan approved by an authorised agency of the State government will study the situation to show that the annual replenishment of sand in the mining lease area is sufficient to sustain the mining operations at levels prescribed in the mining plan, it said.
If the mining lease area is likely to result into a cluster situation or if the periphery of one lease area is less than one km from the periphery of another and the total lease area equals or exceeds 25 hectares, it should require environment impact assessment (EIA), the order said.
According to Harish Vasudevan, a specialist in environmental laws, the MoEF has negated the recent order of the Supreme Court and the National Green Tribunal which prescribed EIA for all such mining activities.
The tribunal has since August restrained mining or removal of sand from riverbeds without obtaining environmental clearance from the MoEF or the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) and licence from competent authorities, he said.
‘A joke of SC order’
The Ministry has made a joke of the Supreme Court order, which too has prescribed EIA for such activities. Though sand auditing for rivers was suggested in the State earlier, it has not been effectively carried out in the State, Mr. Vasudevan said.
A. Lata of the River Research Centre, Chalakudy, said the MoEF order has come at a time when environmentalists have been calling for sand-mining holidays for Kerala rivers. The rivers should be allowed to recover from the damage imparted by unregulated sand-mining, she said.
Sand auditing
Environmentalists have been campaigning for sand auditing to find out the volume of sand that could be mined from the rivers. The new order would hasten the degradation of the river ecosystem and also worsen the drinking water availability in the State, Ms. Lata said.
N.K. Sukumaran Nair, general secretary, Pampa Parirakshana Samithi, said the order would bring in irrecoverable ecological damage to the State. Unregulated sand-mining has resulted in the lowering of riverbed and depletion of groundwater levels.
It has also led to saline water incursion in unprecedented areas.
The situation would turn worse if no check measures are put in place to protect the rivers, Mr. Nair said.
A member of the SEIAA, who wished not to be quoted, has shared the concerns expressed by environmentalists. With the order, the check measures, including public hearing and EIA, would have no meaning, he said.

  • No clearance needed for sites below five hectares
  • All sand-mining areas in State are below five hectares

  • Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    NGT terminates chairmen of pollution control boards in 10 states (downtoearth,)

    Cracking the whip on 10 State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) for ad-hoc appointments, the National Green Tribunal has ordered the termination of Chairpersons of these regulatory authorities. The concerned states are Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Kerala, Rajasthan, Telangana, Haryana, Maharashtra and Manipur. The order was given last week by the principal bench of the NGT, chaired by Justice Swatanter Kumar. The recent order of June 8, 2017, comes as a follow-up to an NGT judgment given in August 2016. In that judgment, the NGT had issued directions on appointments of Chairmen and Member Secretaries of the SPCBs, emphasising on crucial roles they have in pollution control and abatement. It then specified required qualifications as well as tenure of the authorities. States were required to act on the orders within three months and frame Rules for appointment [See Box: Highlights of the NGT judgment of 2016 on criteria for SPCB chairperson appointment]. Having

    High dose of Vitamin C and B3 can kill colon cancer cells: study (downtoearth)

    In a first, a team of researchers has found that high doses of Vitamin C and niacin or Vitamin B3 can kill cancer stem cells. A study published in Cell Biology International showed the opposing effects of low and high dose of vitamin C and vitamin B3 on colon cancer stem cells. Led by Bipasha Bose and Sudheer Shenoy, the team found that while low doses (5-25 micromolar) of Vitamin C and B3 proliferate colon cancer stem cells, high doses (100 to 1,000 micromolar) killed cancer stem cells. Such high doses of vitamins can only be achieved through intravenous injections in colon cancer patients. The third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, colon cancer can be prevented by an intake of dietary fibre and lifestyle changes. While the next step of the researchers is to delineate the mechanisms involved in such opposing effects, they also hope to establish a therapeutic dose of Vitamin C and B3 for colon cancer stem cell therapy. “If the therapeutic dose gets validated under in vivo

    SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

    Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”. The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya. It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests. The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach i