‘The proposals sent by States are not demarcated scientifically’
The Ministry of Environment and Forests has decided to
return the Ecologically Sensitive Zone (ESZ) proposals sent by various
States as many of them are not demarcated scientifically. States will
have to rework the proposals and resubmit them.
Ministry
sources said they received 406 proposals from Chief Wildlife Wardens of
different States. The proposals were sent to the Wildlife Institute of
India, Dehra Dun, which scrutinised them and pointed out the
modifications that needed to be incorporated in each proposal. The
Ministry would return the proposals within a month, the sources said.
In
the case of bird sanctuaries in most of the States, the ESZ had been
earmarked within the water-bound areas, the Ministry pointed out. The
States explained that these sanctuaries were mainly created to act as
irrigation tanks for farmers. A senior official from the Ministry said:
“Not even 10 metre distance from the water-bound area has been
demarcated as ESZ in many bird sanctuaries in the country. Similarly,
most of the proposals appeared to be prepared in haste with no focus on
conservation.”
Tamil Nadu examples
Referring to Tamil Nadu, the Ministry sources citing
the example of Vedanthangal said the State Wildlife authorities
declared the bund of the Vedanthangal tank as the maximum area for
covering ESZ. Similarly, in Pulicat the authorities have not issued ESZ
proposal, stating that already 13 fishing villages were located inside
the Pulicat area. In the case of Guindy National Park, the authorities
have not included the IIT campus. The Ministry officials said IIT was
carved out from a portion of the Park. With regard to Tiger Reserves in
the State, the Ministry sources said up to the buffer zone, areas were
declared as ESZ. However, when it came to inter-state boundaries between
two tiger reserves, the States have not held consultation meetings with
their neighbours before sending the proposal. Ministry sources said
there was a misconception among many that the ESZ orders were
prohibitory in nature. Actually, the orders were only a regulatory
mechanism to stop unauthorised activities near the sanctuaries, national
parks or in the tiger reserves.
Comments
Post a Comment