Skip to main content

Quality is a concern in higher education

We have some islands of excellence like IITs, IIMs, NIITs, IIScs: expert

APSCHE Chairman L. Venugopala Reddy (centre) having a word with NAAC former director V.S. Prasad at a workshop on quality in higher education in Vijayawada on Thursday. Vice-Chancellor V. Venkaiah is seen.— Photo: V. RAJU
APSCHE Chairman L. Venugopala Reddy (centre) having a word with NAAC former director V.S. Prasad at a workshop on quality in higher education in Vijayawada on Thursday. Vice-Chancellor V. Venkaiah is seen.— Photo: V. RAJU
At the two-day workshop jointly organised by Krishna University and APSCHE on ‘Assessment and accreditation a tool to enhance quality and excellence in higher education’ held at KVSR Siddhartha College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, the focus was on quality in higher education.

Delivering a lecture, the former National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) Director V.S. Prasad said that any discussion on quality in higher education in India is invariably leading to the concern of absence of a place in a first 100 or 200 or 300 or 500 world class universities in world rankings of universities by different agencies.
“We have some islands of excellence like IITs, IIMs, NIITs, IIScs and some reputed colleges. But will this elite system contribute to the up-gradation of the ‘sea of mediocrity’? These institutions of excellence may be providing education to about 5 to 10 per cent of students in higher education. The rest are studying in institutions which are part of the ‘sea of mediocrity’. How to reduce the breadth and depth of ‘sea of mediocrity’ is the serious concern of higher education, today,” he said.
Fund allocation
Critical about the fund allocation for higher education, he pointed out that over 90 per cent of the funds were being allocated to the premier 10 per cent of the institution, which is upsetting the balance.
Talking about the vision of universities, he said, “A university should be a place for providing a student with an opportunity for all-round and well-proportioned education for effective living and citizenship, in addition to preparation for a calling. This vision is missing in the present day system of higher education.”
He said that there was a mismatch between qualifications and competencies in the higher education. “This is true in professional programmes also. The challenge is to make private education a ‘public good’. Missionary colleges, institutions of Tata Trust and other philanthropic institutions such as Azim Premji University are some examples of ‘Public good’ role model of private provision.”
On Rashtriya Ucchatar Shiksha Abhiyan, popularly known as RUSA, the former NAAC Director said that the MHRD programme had been included in the 12{+t}{+h}plan for strengthening State level universities and colleges with more funding and many governance reforms.
“The emphasis of RUSA is on professional management of higher education at institutional level with performance based funding and support. RUSA emphasizes the de-politicisation of higher education governance. It is a refreshing idea at a time when many politicians see academic institutions as power centres and as valuable sources of patronage. How effectively these ideas will be translated into action is to be seen,” noted Professor V.S. Prasad

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NGT terminates chairmen of pollution control boards in 10 states (downtoearth,)

Cracking the whip on 10 State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) for ad-hoc appointments, the National Green Tribunal has ordered the termination of Chairpersons of these regulatory authorities. The concerned states are Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Kerala, Rajasthan, Telangana, Haryana, Maharashtra and Manipur. The order was given last week by the principal bench of the NGT, chaired by Justice Swatanter Kumar. The recent order of June 8, 2017, comes as a follow-up to an NGT judgment given in August 2016. In that judgment, the NGT had issued directions on appointments of Chairmen and Member Secretaries of the SPCBs, emphasising on crucial roles they have in pollution control and abatement. It then specified required qualifications as well as tenure of the authorities. States were required to act on the orders within three months and frame Rules for appointment [See Box: Highlights of the NGT judgment of 2016 on criteria for SPCB chairperson appointment]. Having

High dose of Vitamin C and B3 can kill colon cancer cells: study (downtoearth)

In a first, a team of researchers has found that high doses of Vitamin C and niacin or Vitamin B3 can kill cancer stem cells. A study published in Cell Biology International showed the opposing effects of low and high dose of vitamin C and vitamin B3 on colon cancer stem cells. Led by Bipasha Bose and Sudheer Shenoy, the team found that while low doses (5-25 micromolar) of Vitamin C and B3 proliferate colon cancer stem cells, high doses (100 to 1,000 micromolar) killed cancer stem cells. Such high doses of vitamins can only be achieved through intravenous injections in colon cancer patients. The third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, colon cancer can be prevented by an intake of dietary fibre and lifestyle changes. While the next step of the researchers is to delineate the mechanisms involved in such opposing effects, they also hope to establish a therapeutic dose of Vitamin C and B3 for colon cancer stem cell therapy. “If the therapeutic dose gets validated under in vivo

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”. The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya. It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests. The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach i