Skip to main content

Sensitive Japan asks India to address safe use of nuclear energy

Even as hopes rise of a civil nuclear accord with Japan following confirmation that its Prime Minister Shinzo Abe will be the chief guest at Republic Day celebrations here, an influential lawmaker from Tokyo indicated on Monday that the path ahead was still not smooth and India should make concessions keeping in mind Japanese sensitivities. Chief Representative of the New Komeito Party Natsuo Yamaguchi assured India of a “flexible approach from the Japanese side” if it addressed some “areas of concern” such as non-proliferation, Comprehensive [Nuclear] Test Ban Treaty and safe use of nuclear energy for civilian purposes
.
“Japan has experienced nuclear bomb and an [nuclear] accident. Both are quite delicate and sensitive to the Japanese psyche. Respect of the public’s sentiments needs to be considered,” he told External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid.
The New Komeito Party has been a steadfast supporter of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party but Mr. Yamaguchi has shown signs of his party differing on some aspects of state policy. These led Mr. Abe to open talks last month with Opposition parties such as Ishin No Kai.
Mr. Yamaguchi, who confirmed that Mr. Abe would be coming here for the Republic Day parade, is leading a delegation of parliamentarians. His visit is part of the process of stepping up political exchanges as the two countries set out to improve ties in the strategic sphere of defence, high tech and regional cooperation in partnership with the U.S. In fact, Defence Minister Itsunori Onodera met his Indian counterpart A.K. Antony on Monday to touch upon some aspects of this hi-tech cooperation including the proposal to assemble in India a Japanese dual-use plane.
During the meeting with Vice-President Hamid Ansari, Mr. Yamaguchi said it was vital to learn from Japan’s failures such as the inability to address timely the destruction to the environment during industrialisation and delayed action in addressing changes in social structure leading to an ageing society gathering momentum.
According to the Japanese leader, Mr. Ansari responded by admitting that it was a tough task to balance the priorities of development and its impact on the environment. In India, the population could not be controlled during the early decades. The lower demographic profile at present was an asset but had to be carefully groomed so that it did not become a destructive force, he said.
Defence cooperation
Gaurav Vivek Bhatnagar reports:
The two countries resolved to continue their defence consultation and cooperation, including in maritime security, at Monday’s meeting of their Defence Ministers.
When Mr. Onodera’s visit was announced in late December, some Japanese news agencies reported, citing government sources, that he “plans to promote talks to export Japan’s US-2 amphibious aircraft used by the Maritime Self-Defence Force (MSDF) to India, prior to the scheduled visit to the country by Mr. Abe in late January.”
However, sources here said that while Japan had been pitching for the sale of these aircraft as a special case, for the moment it did not figure on India’s list of priorities.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NGT terminates chairmen of pollution control boards in 10 states (downtoearth,)

Cracking the whip on 10 State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) for ad-hoc appointments, the National Green Tribunal has ordered the termination of Chairpersons of these regulatory authorities. The concerned states are Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Kerala, Rajasthan, Telangana, Haryana, Maharashtra and Manipur. The order was given last week by the principal bench of the NGT, chaired by Justice Swatanter Kumar. The recent order of June 8, 2017, comes as a follow-up to an NGT judgment given in August 2016. In that judgment, the NGT had issued directions on appointments of Chairmen and Member Secretaries of the SPCBs, emphasising on crucial roles they have in pollution control and abatement. It then specified required qualifications as well as tenure of the authorities. States were required to act on the orders within three months and frame Rules for appointment [See Box: Highlights of the NGT judgment of 2016 on criteria for SPCB chairperson appointment]. Having

High dose of Vitamin C and B3 can kill colon cancer cells: study (downtoearth)

In a first, a team of researchers has found that high doses of Vitamin C and niacin or Vitamin B3 can kill cancer stem cells. A study published in Cell Biology International showed the opposing effects of low and high dose of vitamin C and vitamin B3 on colon cancer stem cells. Led by Bipasha Bose and Sudheer Shenoy, the team found that while low doses (5-25 micromolar) of Vitamin C and B3 proliferate colon cancer stem cells, high doses (100 to 1,000 micromolar) killed cancer stem cells. Such high doses of vitamins can only be achieved through intravenous injections in colon cancer patients. The third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, colon cancer can be prevented by an intake of dietary fibre and lifestyle changes. While the next step of the researchers is to delineate the mechanisms involved in such opposing effects, they also hope to establish a therapeutic dose of Vitamin C and B3 for colon cancer stem cell therapy. “If the therapeutic dose gets validated under in vivo

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”. The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya. It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests. The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach i