For more than 14 months, the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) stubbornly
refused to listen to reason. It engaged in a ‘no-win’ stand-off with
the International Olympic Committee (IOC), staking the country’s Olympic
future. It drew contempt for its officials amidst a power struggle,
before accepting the inevitable. Suspended by the IOC in December 2012
for violation of the Olympic
Charter, the IOA eventually bowed to every
diktat of the former in holding fresh elections on February 9 under
IOC-dictated rules. This has paved the way for India’s return to the
Olympic fold. What started off as a tussle between the Union government
and the IOA regarding the implementation of the National Sports Code,
ended up in a ‘cleansing’ operation that kept out officials
“charge-framed” by courts from the elections ordered by the IOC. The IOC
advocates ‘principles of good governance’ while the IOA has through the
years tried to hide behind the cloak of ‘autonomy’ ordained in the
Charter. The government, faced with criticism both within and outside
Parliament about poor administration of sports in the country, had
started tightening the rules governing the IOA and the national
federations, when the IOC slapped the suspension on India.
The quick response of the IOC in lifting the suspension to enable the
Indian tricolour to be flown at the ongoing Winter Olympics at Sochi,
Russia, showed that it was completely satisfied with a repentant IOA.
The IOC might have managed to push through more stringent clauses than
that could have been possible in other times while demanding clarity to
the IOA constitution. But problem areas still remain. The IOA could be
expected to bargain hard with the government in order to retain what is
left of its autonomy and that of the national federations when the draft
National Sports Development Bill is amended. The 25 per cent
representation in the Executive to Athletes’ Commission members, as
incorporated in the draft, is far from reality. The continuation of
State Olympic associations as voting-members in the IOA, in a clear
attempt to manipulate vote banks, is much against the provisions in the
Olympic Charter, and the wishes of the IOC and the government. National
federations in boxing, fencing and taekwondo remain suspended by the
respective international federations and were barred from voting in the
recent IOA elections. The IOA needs to facilitate their quick return to
international sports. Faction feuds within federations should be tackled
urgently, and so too questions related to the democratic functioning of
the sports bodies that have come up in court cases. The IOA chief, N.
Ramachandran, who represents a new phase and has taken over in
challenging circumstances, has his task cut out.
Comments
Post a Comment