Skip to main content

Have you got President’s nod for Aadhaar, SC asks Centre

Scheme infringes on right to privacy, says petition

The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Union government whether it obtained the nod from the
President before the Aadhaar scheme was started.
A Bench comprising Justices B.S. Chauhan, J. Chelameswar and M.Y. Eqbal, hearing a batch of petitions challenging the validity of the Aadhaar scheme, asked Solicitor-General Mohan Parasaran to give an explanation in this regard on February 11, when the matter would be taken up for further hearing.
Senior counsel Shyam Divan, appearing for petitioners, K.S. Puttaswamy, retired judge of the Karnataka High Court, and others, contended that the scheme was unconstitutional as individuals obtaining an Aadhaar number were required to part with personal information such as biometrics, iris and fingerprints, which infringed on right to privacy, held to be part of the fundamental right to life under Article 21. He argued that there were no safeguards or penalties and no legislative backing for obtaining personal information.
The Bench told counsel: “If anybody says he wants to voluntarily give details can the court say no, you should not give? You can say, make the scheme voluntary. Those who do not want to give details let them not. Whether we follow the scheme or not it is for you to accept. It should be voluntary. He will not be discriminated against for non-possession of the card. But you tell us whether it should be banned at all. Your apprehensions and misgivings cannot be a ground for challenging the constitutional provisions. If it is done in the interest of security of a nation, is it unconstitutional? Even otherwise no fundamental right is absolute.”
Mr. Divan said, “But that is our grievance, they are giving the card to not only citizens but also illegal migrants. They have so far not changed the protocol of the scheme to bring in any safeguard.” He said the linkage of Aadhaar number with various governmental benefits and services such as food security under the newly enacted Food Security Act, LPG subsidy, the Employees’ Provident Fund, and other DBT benefits, made enrolment with the Aadhaar scheme and obtaining Aadhaar scheme mandatory, completely falsifying the government’s claim of it being voluntary.

  • Bench asks SG to give explanation on February 11

  • No fundamental right is absolute, says court
  • Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    Cloud seeding

    Demonstrating the function of the flare rack that carries silver iodide for cloud-seeding through an aircraft. 
    Water is essential for life on the earth. Precipitation from the skies is the only source for it. India and the rest of Asia are dependent on the monsoons for rains. While the South West Monsoon is the main source for India as a whole, Tamil Nadu and coastal areas of South Andhra Pradesh get the benefit of the North East Monsoon, which is just a less dependable beat on the reversal of the South West Monsoon winds.

    SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

    Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”.

    The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya.

    It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests.

    The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach it in …

    India’s criminal wastage: over 10 million works under MGNREGA incomplete or abandoned (hindu)

    In the last three and half years, the rate of work completion under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) has drastically declined, leading to wastage of public money and leaving villages more prone to drought. This could also be a reason for people moving out of the programme.

    At a time when more than one-third of India’s districts are reeling under a drought-like situation due to deficit rainfall, here comes another bad news. The works started under the MGNREGA—close to 80 per cent related to water conservation, irrigation and land development—are increasingly not being completed or in practice, abandoned.

    Going by the data (as on October 12) in the Ministry of Rural Development’s website, which tracks progress of MGNREGA through a comprehensive MIS, 10.4 million works have not been completed since April 2014. In the last three and half years, 39.7 million works were started under the programme. Going by the stipulation under the programme, close to 7…