Skip to main content

India patent regime not about access to medicine: U.S body

In an indirect jab at India’s support towards generic drug-makers, GIPC of the chamber of commerce has pointed out that in many cases, multi-national drug-makers would give away the drug for free. File photo.
AP In an indirect jab at India’s support towards generic drug-makers, GIPC of the chamber of commerce has pointed out that in many cases, multi-national drug-makers would give away the drug for free. File photo.

With U.S Trade Representative Michael Froman set to announce a trade enforcement action tied to India, the highly influential U.S Chamber of Commerce has lashed out at India’s recent pattern of pharma patent denials, pointing out that the country’s actions “are not about access to medicine.”
In the case of Swiss drug-maker Novartis, whose cancer drug’s patent protections were dismissed by the Supreme Court, the chamber has argued that the patent revocation led to the drug actually becoming “more expensive for Indian patients.”
The chamber’s argument is part of a set of recent recommendations, which were submitted to the office of the U.S trade representative (UTSR). The recommendations are being by trade experts as a pointer to what sectors the USTR’s expected trade enforcement actions could affect.
In an indirect jab at India’s support towards generic drug-makers, the Global Intellectual Property Centre (GIPC) of the chamber of commerce has pointed out that in many cases, multi-national drug-makers would give away the drug for free.
“In the case of Glivec, Novartis provided the leukaemia drug to 95 per cent of patient population for free. The annual cost for Glivec generic treatment is approximately three to for times the average annual income in India,” the chamber said.
Thus, the chamber points out, it is actually “more expensive for Indian patents to obtain access to these medicines after the patent revocation than it was before”.
In its submission, the chamber has also asked that India be classified as a ‘priority foreign country’— a tag that is generally given to the worst intellectual property offenders, and is also a classification that could trigger trade sanctions.
It also warns of a possible domino effect, with other countries following India as an example of bad behaviour.
“India’s policies are clearly discriminatory, in contravention to their obligations under TRIPS (The Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights). In addition, other countries such as South Africa, Brazil, Argentina and even China are closely monitoring this new Indian IP model.”
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”. The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya. It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests. The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach i...
3 comments
Click Here To Read more »

What's ailing Namami Gange programme?(DTE)

Winters are extremely hectic for Sushma Patel, a vegetable grower in Uttar Pradesh’s Chunar town. Her farm is in the fertile plains of Ganga where people grow three crops a year. But this is the only season when she can grow vegetables. And before that, she needs to manually dig out shreds of plastic and wrappers from her one-hectare (ha) farm. “This is all because of the nullah,” she says, pointing at an open drain that runs through her field, carrying sewage from the neighbourhood to the Ganga. “Every monsoon, the drain overflows and inundates the field with a thick, black sludge and plastic debris. We cannot even go near the field as the stench of sewage fills the air,” she says. But Patel has no one to complain to as this is the way of life for most people in this ancient town. About 70 per cent of the people in Chunar depend on toilets that have on-site sanitation, such as septic tanks and pits. In the absence of a proper disposal or management system, people simply dump the faec...
3 comments
Click Here To Read more »

"ISRO has capabilities to build geostationary satellites for air quality monitoring” (downtoearth)

Pawan Gupta's findings on trans-boundary movement of pollution (Punjab to Delhi) from biomass burning in 2015 spurred debates. He participated in discussions with Indian regulators early September at the Better Air Quality Conference in Busan on the advantages of using satellite data for air quality monitoring. He explains to Down to Earth how air quality monitoring is done using satellite data. How is satellite data used to measure air pollution? Satellites that provide information on atmospheric pollutants are normally (not always) in the low earth orbits (400-1000 km above the Earth’s surface). A single satellite can carry one or more remote sensing instruments onboard that look down to earth and obtain information about the object in the field of view of satellite sensor. The Earth receives electromagnetic radiation from the sun, which travels through space and reaches the earth-atmosphere system. The radiation then interacts with the Earth’s atmosphere and the surface...
1 comment
Click Here To Read more »