Skip to main content

One-year separation enough for divorce for Christian couples: HC

Now, Christian spouses in Karnataka need to live separately only for a year, instead of the existing two-year period, for seeking dissolution of marriage by mutual consent.

The Karnataka High Court on Monday declared that a judgment of the Kerala High Court — which in 2010 declared as unconstitutional the imposition of two-year separation period for divorce by mutual consent under Divorce Act, 1869 — is applicable to Karnataka also.
A Division Bench, comprising Chief Justice D.H. Waghela and Justice B.V. Nagarathna, said the verdict of the Kerala High Court had become the law for the entire country, as the judgment was not challenged in the Supreme Court by the Union government, which was a respondent before Kerala High Court.
PIL
The Bench passed the order while disposing of a public interest litigation (PIL) petition, filed by Shiv Kumar, an advocate and master trainer at the Bangalore Mediation Centre, which had challenged the validity of Section 10A of the Act that prescribes two-year period prior to filling of petition for divorce by Christians.
Other divorce laws
The petitioner pointed out that spouses should have lived separately only for a year if they had to file a petition for divorce by mutual consent under Section 28 of the Special Marriages Act, 1954, Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, and Section 32B of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936.
The petitioner, citing Kerala High Court’s verdict, had contended that Section 10A was discriminatory as it imposed two-year separation period unlike other religions.
The Roman Catholic Church (RCC) had stated that as marriage was not considered in the same light by different communities in India and the “RCC’s firm conviction is that marriage is a ‘Sacrament,’ it would stand to reason that given sufficiently long time, the [Christian] spouses stand better chance of sorting out their differences and bring about settlement…”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NGT terminates chairmen of pollution control boards in 10 states (downtoearth,)

Cracking the whip on 10 State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) for ad-hoc appointments, the National Green Tribunal has ordered the termination of Chairpersons of these regulatory authorities. The concerned states are Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Kerala, Rajasthan, Telangana, Haryana, Maharashtra and Manipur. The order was given last week by the principal bench of the NGT, chaired by Justice Swatanter Kumar. The recent order of June 8, 2017, comes as a follow-up to an NGT judgment given in August 2016. In that judgment, the NGT had issued directions on appointments of Chairmen and Member Secretaries of the SPCBs, emphasising on crucial roles they have in pollution control and abatement. It then specified required qualifications as well as tenure of the authorities. States were required to act on the orders within three months and frame Rules for appointment [See Box: Highlights of the NGT judgment of 2016 on criteria for SPCB chairperson appointment]. Having

High dose of Vitamin C and B3 can kill colon cancer cells: study (downtoearth)

In a first, a team of researchers has found that high doses of Vitamin C and niacin or Vitamin B3 can kill cancer stem cells. A study published in Cell Biology International showed the opposing effects of low and high dose of vitamin C and vitamin B3 on colon cancer stem cells. Led by Bipasha Bose and Sudheer Shenoy, the team found that while low doses (5-25 micromolar) of Vitamin C and B3 proliferate colon cancer stem cells, high doses (100 to 1,000 micromolar) killed cancer stem cells. Such high doses of vitamins can only be achieved through intravenous injections in colon cancer patients. The third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, colon cancer can be prevented by an intake of dietary fibre and lifestyle changes. While the next step of the researchers is to delineate the mechanisms involved in such opposing effects, they also hope to establish a therapeutic dose of Vitamin C and B3 for colon cancer stem cell therapy. “If the therapeutic dose gets validated under in vivo

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”. The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya. It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests. The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach i