Skip to main content

Street vendors bill passed by Rajya Sabha

The Rajya Sabha on Wednesday passed The Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Bill. Once enacted it will provide relief to hundreds of thousands of street vendors across the country who have been facing regular harassment at the hands of police and municipalities.
The bill ensures protection of livelihood rights and social security of street vendors and provides for regulation of urban street vending in the country. Lok Sabha had passed the bill on September 6, last year.

Terming street vendors as an integral part of urban economy, Girija Vyas, Minister of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation, said in Parliament that street vending provides self-employment to the poor and affordable and convenient services to majority of population, especially common people.
Vyas informed Parliament that the ministry has accepted most of the recommendations made by the standing committee.
The Parliament standing committee that deliberated on the bill made 26 recommendations. The ministry has accepted 17 recommendations fully, three recommendations in part or with modifications, and has rejected six recommendations.
Long consultations preceded passage
The bill was finalised after lengthy consultations across the country.
At the time of revising the National Policy on Urban Street Vendors in 2009, the government underscored the need for a legislative framework to enable street vendors to pursue an honest living without harassment. A model bill was prepared in 2009 which was approved by the Union Cabinet and then circulated to the states for suggestions.
In 2011, three consultation programmes were organised in Patna, Mumbai and Delhi, which were attended by representatives from state governments, urban local bodies, NGOs, civil society, international organisations, experts and street vendors associations.
After consultations, a new bill was drafted and discussed during a national consultations attended by 22 states in April 2012.
Main features of the bill:
It provides for constitution of a Town Vending Authority in each local authority for its implementation.
It ensures participatory decision making for vending activities like determination of natural market, identification of vending zones, preparation of street vending plan and survey of street vendors.
It restricts arbitrariness of authorities. The bill provides for survey of existing vendors in every five years. It also provides for issuing of certificates of vending to all the street vendors identified in the survey, with preference to SC, ST, OBC, women, persons with disabilities and minorities.
It says no street vendor will be evicted until the survey has been completed and certificate of vending issued to the street vendors.
It provides social security: in case of accident, permanent disability, illness or death of a licence holder, the licence can be given to any one family member.
The bill lays down a set of principles to be followed before relocation. But it specifies that relocation of street vendors should be the last resort.
Section 29 of the bill provides for protection of street vendors from harassment by police and other authorities and provides for an overriding clause to ensure they carry on their business without the fear of harassment by the authorities under any other law.
- See more at: http://www.downtoearth.org.in/content/street-vendors-bill-passed-rajya-sabha#.UwoDKqi6YiE

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NGT terminates chairmen of pollution control boards in 10 states (downtoearth,)

Cracking the whip on 10 State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) for ad-hoc appointments, the National Green Tribunal has ordered the termination of Chairpersons of these regulatory authorities. The concerned states are Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Kerala, Rajasthan, Telangana, Haryana, Maharashtra and Manipur. The order was given last week by the principal bench of the NGT, chaired by Justice Swatanter Kumar. The recent order of June 8, 2017, comes as a follow-up to an NGT judgment given in August 2016. In that judgment, the NGT had issued directions on appointments of Chairmen and Member Secretaries of the SPCBs, emphasising on crucial roles they have in pollution control and abatement. It then specified required qualifications as well as tenure of the authorities. States were required to act on the orders within three months and frame Rules for appointment [See Box: Highlights of the NGT judgment of 2016 on criteria for SPCB chairperson appointment]. Having ...

High dose of Vitamin C and B3 can kill colon cancer cells: study (downtoearth)

In a first, a team of researchers has found that high doses of Vitamin C and niacin or Vitamin B3 can kill cancer stem cells. A study published in Cell Biology International showed the opposing effects of low and high dose of vitamin C and vitamin B3 on colon cancer stem cells. Led by Bipasha Bose and Sudheer Shenoy, the team found that while low doses (5-25 micromolar) of Vitamin C and B3 proliferate colon cancer stem cells, high doses (100 to 1,000 micromolar) killed cancer stem cells. Such high doses of vitamins can only be achieved through intravenous injections in colon cancer patients. The third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, colon cancer can be prevented by an intake of dietary fibre and lifestyle changes. While the next step of the researchers is to delineate the mechanisms involved in such opposing effects, they also hope to establish a therapeutic dose of Vitamin C and B3 for colon cancer stem cell therapy. “If the therapeutic dose gets validated under in vivo...

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”. The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya. It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests. The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach i...