Skip to main content

Paswan, Modi back each other against barbs

Gujarat Chief Minister is man of development, says LJP leader   Lok Jan Shakti Party (LJP) president Ram Vilas Paswan cemented his renewed alliance with the BJP by addressing Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi as “Vikas Purush (man of development)” and “future Prime Minister” at a rally in Muzaffarpur district in Bihar on Monday.   Sharing the dais with the prime ministerial candidate of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA), Mr. Paswan, who resigned from the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government in the wake of the 2002 Gujarat riots, denied the charge of communalism levelled against Mr. Modi.   “At present, Gujarat is a State where there has been no communal incident since 2002, whereas in Bihar, there is one every month. There is no rigid caste structure today. Everyone has become one community. India is a garden with floral variety. The person who tends all the flowers is a good gardener,” he said.   The rally showcased the NDA’s strength in Bihar, where the LJP and the Rashtriya Lok Samata Party of the Other Backward Classes leader Upendra Kushwaha are in alliance with the BJP. Coming together for the first time on a political platform, Mr. Paswan and Mr. Modi backed each other against the criticisms levelled against them.   Countering the criticism from Chief Minister Nitish Kumar and Rashtriya Janata Dal president Lalu Prasad, Mr. Paswan said, “When I was with them, they gave me a certificate of virtue. Now that I am with the NDA, I have suddenly become a bad person.”   Mr. Modi said Mr. Paswan lacked hypocrisy in dealing with his political opponents. “There is no place for hypocrisy in democracy. Mr. Paswan left us (in 2002), but whenever we met, he interacted in a friendly manner. And if he was photographed with me, he did not shy away from the cameras,” Mr. Modi said in a veiled attack of the Bihar Chief Minister, who had expressed unease about sitting at the same table with him at a meeting in Delhi.   Mr. Modi said his critics had found “Satta ki jadibuti [medicine for power]” in the narrative of secularism.   “Every time we talk of unemployment, inflation, food security, farmers, they say secularism is in danger. Theirs is a fraudulent argument. They have no answer for, or commitment to, these issues. For them, secularism is an election slogan, vote-bank politics, appeasement of a few and justice for none, and putting religion first. For us, secularism means politics of development for all, appeasement of none and justice for all,” he said.“The country’s politics is divided between Modi’s politics of stopping inflation, corruption and atrocities, and those who want to stop Modi.”   Criticising the third alternative of 11 parties, Mr. Modi said: “They rise only before an election. These ‘chunavi khiladi’ (poll players) spoil the election scenario and are never up to any good. Most of the parties of the front are trying to save the Congress,” he said.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NGT terminates chairmen of pollution control boards in 10 states (downtoearth,)

Cracking the whip on 10 State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) for ad-hoc appointments, the National Green Tribunal has ordered the termination of Chairpersons of these regulatory authorities. The concerned states are Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Kerala, Rajasthan, Telangana, Haryana, Maharashtra and Manipur. The order was given last week by the principal bench of the NGT, chaired by Justice Swatanter Kumar. The recent order of June 8, 2017, comes as a follow-up to an NGT judgment given in August 2016. In that judgment, the NGT had issued directions on appointments of Chairmen and Member Secretaries of the SPCBs, emphasising on crucial roles they have in pollution control and abatement. It then specified required qualifications as well as tenure of the authorities. States were required to act on the orders within three months and frame Rules for appointment [See Box: Highlights of the NGT judgment of 2016 on criteria for SPCB chairperson appointment]. Having

High dose of Vitamin C and B3 can kill colon cancer cells: study (downtoearth)

In a first, a team of researchers has found that high doses of Vitamin C and niacin or Vitamin B3 can kill cancer stem cells. A study published in Cell Biology International showed the opposing effects of low and high dose of vitamin C and vitamin B3 on colon cancer stem cells. Led by Bipasha Bose and Sudheer Shenoy, the team found that while low doses (5-25 micromolar) of Vitamin C and B3 proliferate colon cancer stem cells, high doses (100 to 1,000 micromolar) killed cancer stem cells. Such high doses of vitamins can only be achieved through intravenous injections in colon cancer patients. The third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, colon cancer can be prevented by an intake of dietary fibre and lifestyle changes. While the next step of the researchers is to delineate the mechanisms involved in such opposing effects, they also hope to establish a therapeutic dose of Vitamin C and B3 for colon cancer stem cell therapy. “If the therapeutic dose gets validated under in vivo

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”. The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya. It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests. The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach i