Parliamentary committee’s recommendation a shot in the arm for Haryana IAS officer
In a rare act, the Parliamentary Standing Committee on
Agriculture has come to whistleblower Ashok Khemka’s support, ordering a
Central government inquiry into the pesticide scam that the Haryana IAS
officer uncovered.
The committee also stood by the
views of the IAS officer in another scam — in the purchase of seeds —
again highlighted by Mr. Khemka. The Haryana government continues to
battle against this.
The Hindu
accessed the 61st report of the Parliamentary Standing Committee. It has
ordered that an inquiry be held to investigate the “propriety and
legality of the agriculture department of Haryana spending the Centre’s
money on RAXIL, a specific brand of Bayer Crop Science India, for
unapproved treatment.”
It said the investigation must
find out if there was any “propriety and legality in the action of
Bayer Crop Science India publishing the recommendations of some State
agricultural universities in its advertisements where RAXIL’s
effectiveness in treating Karnal Bunt diseases in wheat crop is
claimed.”
The committee also asked for an
investigation to ascertain why Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana
Agriculture University recommended Bayer’s branded pesticide for Karnal
Bunt diseases.
The committee’s intervention comes as a
shot in the arm for the beleaguered IAS officer, who has been shunted
out and chargesheeted several times after he first raised an alarm about
land deals involving Congress president Sonia Gandhi’s son-in-law
Robert Vadra and subsequently about alleged scams in the Haryana Seeds
Development Corporation Limited, where he had been posted.
The
matter is before the High Court, with the State government, having
shunted out Mr. Khemka yet again, defended its decisions on the
controversial purchase of pesticides and seeds.
Mr. Khemka has been chargesheeted in several alleged violations of Haryana service rules.
The
parliamentary panel, while reviewing the Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana,
was petitioned by Mr. Khemka in which he alleged that Central
government subsidies and funds had been embezzled and wasted by Haryana
government officials in the purchase of seeds and illegal pesticides in
connivance with private companies.
The panel, headed
by Basudev Acharia of the CPI(M) and having members from across the
political spectrum from both Houses, called for evidence even as the
Union Agriculture Ministry came out in Mr. Khemka’s favour.
Based on the evidence gathered through testimony, the standing committee took a final position in favour of Mr. Khemka.
Comments
Post a Comment