Skip to main content

Democracy will not suit China: Xi Jinping

Chinese President Xi Jinping. (file photo)
APChinese President Xi Jinping. (file photo)

China's President Xi Jinping has said that multiparty democracy and development models of other countries "did not suit China" and would "lead to catastrophic consequences" if adopted by Beijing.
Mr. Xi, who began a decade-long term as President in March of last year, said the Communist Party of China (CPC) would "never stop" taking forward reforms, but at the same time as far as the ruling party was concerned the one-party political system would not change.

"China cannot copy the political system or development model of other countries because it would not fit us and it might even lead to catastrophic consequences," the State-run Xinhua news agency on Wednesday quoted Mr. Xi as saying, during a speech delivered to students a day earlier in Belgium, the final stop of an on-going four-nation European tour.
"Constitutional monarchy, imperial restoration, parliamentarism, a multi-party system and a presidential system, we considered them, tried them, but none worked," Mr. Xi was reported as saying.
The new leadership under Mr. Xi in November last year unveiled a sweeping blueprint for ambitious economic reforms.
The Party has, however, tightened its political grip, from reining in outspoken bloggers to stamping out a growing anti-corruption civil society movement, reflecting its reluctance to allow any political loosening.
Mr. Xi in his speech acknowledged that China's reforms process had "entered a deep-water zone, where problems crying to be resolved are all difficult ones".
"What we need is the courage to move the reform forward," he said. "We must get ready to go into the mountain, being fully aware that there may be tigers to encounter".
He, however, warned that China would not follow the political systems of other countries. Doing so would "lead to catastrophic consequences," he said. "The fruit may look the same, but the taste is quite different," he added.
Mr. Xi took over as Party General Secretary in November 2012, and as President in March last year for a decade-long term.
His initial remarks after taking over led some in China to see him as a proponent of gradual political opening. In one of his first speeches Mr. Xi stressed the need to supervise the Party's political power and to establish "the authority of the Constitution and law" as the highest power - a long-standing demand of many Chinese liberal scholars.
But shortly after, in a visit to southern Guangdong, where China's reforms first began, Mr. Xi pledged economic opening but warned against the dangers of political reforms in a speech to Party members.
He drew a comparison with the collapse of the Soviet Union, which he attributed to "their idals and beliefs being shaken".  "To dismiss the history of the Soviet Union and the Soviet Communist Party, to dismiss Lenin and Stalin, and to dismiss everything else is to engage in historic nihilism, and it confuses our thoughts and undermines the party's organisations on all levels," he warned.
"Some people define reform as changes towards the universal values of the West, the Western political system, or it will not constitute 'real' reform. This is a stealthy tampering of the concept and a misunderstanding of our reform."
In the year since taking office, Mr. Xi has increasingly been come to be seen in China as a leader in the mold of Deng Xiaoping: a strong advocate for bold economic reforms, but at the same time a staunch supporter of tightening the Party's political grip.
So far, his administration has emphasised a strong stand against corruption, launching a high-profile campaign against graft and official excess. It has also made clear that it would not countenance challenges to its authority, by quickly stamping out a spreading civil society anti-corruption movement and detaining a number of activists who were campaigning for officials to declare their assets

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NGT terminates chairmen of pollution control boards in 10 states (downtoearth,)

Cracking the whip on 10 State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) for ad-hoc appointments, the National Green Tribunal has ordered the termination of Chairpersons of these regulatory authorities. The concerned states are Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Kerala, Rajasthan, Telangana, Haryana, Maharashtra and Manipur. The order was given last week by the principal bench of the NGT, chaired by Justice Swatanter Kumar. The recent order of June 8, 2017, comes as a follow-up to an NGT judgment given in August 2016. In that judgment, the NGT had issued directions on appointments of Chairmen and Member Secretaries of the SPCBs, emphasising on crucial roles they have in pollution control and abatement. It then specified required qualifications as well as tenure of the authorities. States were required to act on the orders within three months and frame Rules for appointment [See Box: Highlights of the NGT judgment of 2016 on criteria for SPCB chairperson appointment]. Having

High dose of Vitamin C and B3 can kill colon cancer cells: study (downtoearth)

In a first, a team of researchers has found that high doses of Vitamin C and niacin or Vitamin B3 can kill cancer stem cells. A study published in Cell Biology International showed the opposing effects of low and high dose of vitamin C and vitamin B3 on colon cancer stem cells. Led by Bipasha Bose and Sudheer Shenoy, the team found that while low doses (5-25 micromolar) of Vitamin C and B3 proliferate colon cancer stem cells, high doses (100 to 1,000 micromolar) killed cancer stem cells. Such high doses of vitamins can only be achieved through intravenous injections in colon cancer patients. The third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, colon cancer can be prevented by an intake of dietary fibre and lifestyle changes. While the next step of the researchers is to delineate the mechanisms involved in such opposing effects, they also hope to establish a therapeutic dose of Vitamin C and B3 for colon cancer stem cell therapy. “If the therapeutic dose gets validated under in vivo

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”. The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya. It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests. The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach i