Skip to main content

UGC regulation on deemed varsities unconstitutional: HC

The High Court of Karnataka on Thursday declared as “unconstitutional and invalid” the University Grants Commission (Institutions Deemed to be Universities) Regulation 2010 pertaining to governance system, admission and fee structure and opening of campuses of deemed-to-be universities in the country.

The High Court also quashed the circular issued by the UGC in 2010-11 asking all existing deemed-to-be universities to comply with the new regulation.
Justice Anand Byrareddy delivered the verdict while allowing petitions filed by Manipal, Siddartha, KLE, BLDE, Devaraj Urs, Yenepoya and Symbiosis universities challenging the constitutionality and legality of the regulation.
The universities had contended that the regulation besides illegally intruding into the rights of the trusts and persons associated with them and who have set up these institutions, interfered with the administration and admission processes of these private unaided institutions in gross violation of a series of dicta of the Supreme Court.
However, the Union government and the UGC argued that the regulation was aimed at ushering in transparency, accountability and quality in these universities.
Accepting the contentions of the universities, the High Court said that the regulation was in violation of the Supreme Court’s verdicts in T.M.A. Pai Foundation, P.A. Inamdar and other cases as it would take away the control from the managements of private institutes over the admission process and also fixation of fee structure.
Interference either by the UGC or the Centre in these processes of private unaided and minority educational institutions through the regulation is impermissible, the High Court said.


Pointing out that it was not the UGC that authored the regulation but the Ministry concerned, it said that the regulation was also in violation of Section 26 of the UGC Act.
  • Circular issued by UGC in 2010-11 asking all such varsities to comply with the regulation quashed
  • ‘Interference in such educational institutions through the regulation is impermissible’


  • Circular issued by UGC in 2010-11 asking all such varsities to comply with the regulation quashed

    Popular posts from this blog

    Cloud seeding

    Demonstrating the function of the flare rack that carries silver iodide for cloud-seeding through an aircraft. 
    Water is essential for life on the earth. Precipitation from the skies is the only source for it. India and the rest of Asia are dependent on the monsoons for rains. While the South West Monsoon is the main source for India as a whole, Tamil Nadu and coastal areas of South Andhra Pradesh get the benefit of the North East Monsoon, which is just a less dependable beat on the reversal of the South West Monsoon winds.

    Indian Polity Elections (MCQ )

    1. Who of the following has the responsibility of the registration of voters
    a) Individual voters
    b) Government
    c) Election commission
    d) Corporations


    2. Democracy exists in India, without peoples participation and co operation democracy will fail. This implies that
    a) Government should compel people to participate and cooperate with it
    b) People from the government
    c) People should participate and cooperate with the government
    d) India should opt for the presidential system


    3. Which of the following are not the functions of the election commission
    1) Conduct of election for the post of the speaker and the deputy speaker, Lok sabha and the deputy chairman, Rajya sabha
    2) Conduct of elections to the state legislative assemblies
    3) Deciding on all doubts and disputes arising out of elections

    a) 1 and 2
    b) 1 and 3
    c) 2 and 3
    d) 2

    4. Which of the following electoral systems have not been adopted for various elections in India
    1) System of direct elections on the basis of adult suffrage
    2…

    SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

    Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”.

    The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya.

    It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests.

    The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach it in …