Skip to main content

Has a Bangladesh charity found a way to banish extreme poverty? thehindu)


Dughia village is idyllic, but the lives of many of the women who spend their days among its mango orchards, duck ponds and brilliant green paddy fields are anything but. For them, the beauty of the village has been a backdrop to decades of suffering.
They fight back tears to explain how they are lucky to eat once a day and cannot even afford blouses to wear under their tattered sarees. All are illiterate, and several have been parted from their children, who have died, gone to faraway cities or been taken in by other families when the cost of raising them at home proved too much.
“I don’t want to think about my life. It’s a very hard story — even listening to it will make you cry,” says Lalita, who spent 16 years separated from her children, doing back-breaking manual labour to pay off £400 in loans. “My husband got sick, and when he died I was drowning in debt, so I went away to look for work.” Although she travelled barely 100 km, wages were so meagre she couldn’t afford to return home for more than a decade, and when she did her son and daughter were strangers.
Yet, says aid worker Sagarika Indu, in two years’ time the ageing widow and a handful of other women gathered around her, also living without hope or self-confidence, will probably be secure. They will have modest savings, valuable assets in the form of a cow and some chickens, and be respected by fellow villagers, perhaps courted by the relatives who once cast them aside as paupers.
Ms. Indu is confident about this extraordinary transformation because she will be its agent, as head of a rigorously tested project that she has personally seen change thousands of lives. “In Bangladesh we reach 90,000 families a year,” she says of the scheme, which was created more than a decade ago by huge national aid organisation Brac, Ms. Indu’s employer. It has also now been exported to 10 other countries.
It is often described as a “poverty graduation” scheme, because it offers not just a financial lifeline out of destitution, but education, confidence and skills to maintain newfound prosperity.
After two years, the “graduates” can support themselves and their families without further aid, and the team that assisted them can move on to helping others. In Bangladesh alone, more than 1.7 million households have been transformed.
Mutliplying benefits
Supporting people to move out of extreme poverty for a long-term, rather than just providing food, medicine or cash as temporary relief, is a notoriously stubborn challenge, so the “poverty graduation” model has been analysed extensively by academics from the London School of Economics, Yale and other leading universities. They have confirmed that a one-off intervention can permanently end the most crippling destitution, with benefits that multiply over time — making it a kind of holy grail of aid projects.
“The [Targeting Ultra Poverty, or TUP] programme sets beneficiaries on a sustainable path out of poverty,” say the authors of the LSE report, which included seven-year follow-up checks on women once enrolled in the programme. They looked at projects around the world to evaluate whether the model thrived beyond Bangladesh, where Brac can tap into a strong network of services and staff to support the scheme, and found it was still effective in most places.
Charities and governments are often now as keen as bankers to see “return on investment,” although their goal is better lives rather than more profits.
Brac’s vice-chair, Mushtaque Chowdhury, believes the model will be key to the goal of ending the most extreme deprivation within a decade. “I know no other programme that has been followed up for so long, no other trajectory so consistent — not only providing income and occupational changes, but also a wider sustained impact.” — (c) Guardian News & Media Ltd, 2016

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NGT terminates chairmen of pollution control boards in 10 states (downtoearth,)

Cracking the whip on 10 State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) for ad-hoc appointments, the National Green Tribunal has ordered the termination of Chairpersons of these regulatory authorities. The concerned states are Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Kerala, Rajasthan, Telangana, Haryana, Maharashtra and Manipur. The order was given last week by the principal bench of the NGT, chaired by Justice Swatanter Kumar. The recent order of June 8, 2017, comes as a follow-up to an NGT judgment given in August 2016. In that judgment, the NGT had issued directions on appointments of Chairmen and Member Secretaries of the SPCBs, emphasising on crucial roles they have in pollution control and abatement. It then specified required qualifications as well as tenure of the authorities. States were required to act on the orders within three months and frame Rules for appointment [See Box: Highlights of the NGT judgment of 2016 on criteria for SPCB chairperson appointment]. Having

High dose of Vitamin C and B3 can kill colon cancer cells: study (downtoearth)

In a first, a team of researchers has found that high doses of Vitamin C and niacin or Vitamin B3 can kill cancer stem cells. A study published in Cell Biology International showed the opposing effects of low and high dose of vitamin C and vitamin B3 on colon cancer stem cells. Led by Bipasha Bose and Sudheer Shenoy, the team found that while low doses (5-25 micromolar) of Vitamin C and B3 proliferate colon cancer stem cells, high doses (100 to 1,000 micromolar) killed cancer stem cells. Such high doses of vitamins can only be achieved through intravenous injections in colon cancer patients. The third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, colon cancer can be prevented by an intake of dietary fibre and lifestyle changes. While the next step of the researchers is to delineate the mechanisms involved in such opposing effects, they also hope to establish a therapeutic dose of Vitamin C and B3 for colon cancer stem cell therapy. “If the therapeutic dose gets validated under in vivo

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”. The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya. It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests. The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach i