Skip to main content

Centre's order allows granting of mine leases to applications without environment clearance (downtoearth)

In a bid to prevent lease applications from lapsing, the Ministry of Mines has issued an order asking state governments to grant mining lease to certain applicants even if they do not have environment clearance. The Union ministry’s order is only applicable to cases where application was submitted before January 2015, when a crucial amendment was passed.

The order, dated January 4, states that no mining activity will be allowed until the environmental clearance is obtained. The latest development has prompted confusion, experts say.

It allows mining leases for projects that have a letter of intent from respective state governments and were in process of procuring clearances before Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act of 2015, was passed. The amendment, which mandated the grant of mining leases only through auctions, allowed a two-year-long period to older applicants to obtain a lease. Come January 12, the window ends.

The ministry’s order prevents more than 100 applications from lapsing. However, environment experts caution that there has to be a clear process spelt out in case a lessee is eventually denied the environment clearance. “If in case the clearance does not come through, what will happen to the lease? It should be clearly put out whether the lease will stand cancelled or not,” said environment lawyer Rahul Choudhary. “There should not be instances where, despite the clearance not coming through, the lease still holds. It might create a situation conducive to illegalities,” he added.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NGT terminates chairmen of pollution control boards in 10 states (downtoearth,)

Cracking the whip on 10 State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) for ad-hoc appointments, the National Green Tribunal has ordered the termination of Chairpersons of these regulatory authorities. The concerned states are Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Kerala, Rajasthan, Telangana, Haryana, Maharashtra and Manipur. The order was given last week by the principal bench of the NGT, chaired by Justice Swatanter Kumar. The recent order of June 8, 2017, comes as a follow-up to an NGT judgment given in August 2016. In that judgment, the NGT had issued directions on appointments of Chairmen and Member Secretaries of the SPCBs, emphasising on crucial roles they have in pollution control and abatement. It then specified required qualifications as well as tenure of the authorities. States were required to act on the orders within three months and frame Rules for appointment [See Box: Highlights of the NGT judgment of 2016 on criteria for SPCB chairperson appointment]. Having

High dose of Vitamin C and B3 can kill colon cancer cells: study (downtoearth)

In a first, a team of researchers has found that high doses of Vitamin C and niacin or Vitamin B3 can kill cancer stem cells. A study published in Cell Biology International showed the opposing effects of low and high dose of vitamin C and vitamin B3 on colon cancer stem cells. Led by Bipasha Bose and Sudheer Shenoy, the team found that while low doses (5-25 micromolar) of Vitamin C and B3 proliferate colon cancer stem cells, high doses (100 to 1,000 micromolar) killed cancer stem cells. Such high doses of vitamins can only be achieved through intravenous injections in colon cancer patients. The third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, colon cancer can be prevented by an intake of dietary fibre and lifestyle changes. While the next step of the researchers is to delineate the mechanisms involved in such opposing effects, they also hope to establish a therapeutic dose of Vitamin C and B3 for colon cancer stem cell therapy. “If the therapeutic dose gets validated under in vivo

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”. The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya. It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests. The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach i