Skip to main content

New system kicks up a storm at RCC (thehindu/)

Radiation oncologists oppose multidisciplinary tumour boards

An internal dispute at the Regional Cancer Centre (RCC) over the government’s decision to introduce multidisciplinary tumour (MDT) boards in place of the cancer site-specific clinic system is threatening to disturb the fragile peace in the institution, which has been witnessing a lot of internal and administrative issues of late.

On Monday, the entire Department of Radiation oncology marched to the office of RCC Director Paul Sebastian in protest against the “sudden” decision of the administration to change the treatment plan and system, which they said had been the norm since the inception of the centre.

The Superintendent, Deputy Superintendent, Head of Radiation Oncology Department and doctors holding the posts of chairmen of the Ethics Committee Institutional Review Board resigned their posts in protest against “ the haste” with which the decision to introduce the MDT system had been implemented.

It was on December 30 that the Director issued the order that as per the government’s directive MDTs will be constituted in the RCC, including medical oncologists, surgical oncologists, radiation oncologists and oncopathologists, with effect from January 2.

The order says the MDTs will be set up in all site-specific clinics in the RCC and that these will function as academic forums to diagnose and stage cancers and to formulate a comprehensive treatment and follow-up plan of all patients through discussions and consensus.

It says that “all registered cases every day will be distributed among the consultants attending the outpatient clinics in a judicious manner, making sure that surgical cases go to the surgical oncologist, patients for chemo radiation go to the radiation oncologist, patients for primary chemotherapy go to the medical oncologist… in a fair manner.”

Radiation oncologists said they were bothered about the manner in which the MDT was being implemented and that they had several concerns, which needed clarification from the Director. They said the current site-specific clinic system had been working well for patients without any hitches and that the administration was playing “divide and rule” amongst doctors.

“All these years, we have had the site-specific clinics and our practice has been thus confined to the management of cancers in specific sites. We are trained to give both radiation as well as chemotherapy. With the new system, radiation oncologists are being told to confine ourselves to our own specialities while the medical oncologists are allowed to see all kinds of cancers, which is not fair,” a senior radiation oncologist said.

“The MDT is an internationally accepted practice prevalent in all major cancer institutions, with improved clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction, because a group of specialists from various disciplines are coming together to decide cancer staging and formulate the treatment plan. The system is already being practised at the Malabar Cancer Centre. At the RCC, however, radiation oncologists have been at the helm of patient management so far,” Additional Chief Secretary, Health, Rajeev Sadanandan told The Hindu .


Popular posts from this blog

Cloud seeding

Demonstrating the function of the flare rack that carries silver iodide for cloud-seeding through an aircraft. 
Water is essential for life on the earth. Precipitation from the skies is the only source for it. India and the rest of Asia are dependent on the monsoons for rains. While the South West Monsoon is the main source for India as a whole, Tamil Nadu and coastal areas of South Andhra Pradesh get the benefit of the North East Monsoon, which is just a less dependable beat on the reversal of the South West Monsoon winds.

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”.

The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya.

It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests.

The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach it in …

India’s criminal wastage: over 10 million works under MGNREGA incomplete or abandoned (hindu)

In the last three and half years, the rate of work completion under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) has drastically declined, leading to wastage of public money and leaving villages more prone to drought. This could also be a reason for people moving out of the programme.

At a time when more than one-third of India’s districts are reeling under a drought-like situation due to deficit rainfall, here comes another bad news. The works started under the MGNREGA—close to 80 per cent related to water conservation, irrigation and land development—are increasingly not being completed or in practice, abandoned.

Going by the data (as on October 12) in the Ministry of Rural Development’s website, which tracks progress of MGNREGA through a comprehensive MIS, 10.4 million works have not been completed since April 2014. In the last three and half years, 39.7 million works were started under the programme. Going by the stipulation under the programme, close to 7…