Skip to main content

Australian PM insists on refugees deal, which Trump terms 'dumb' (Hindu.)

News report details a tense exchange between the President and Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull during their first telephone call as national leaders.

Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has insisted that a deal struck with the Obama administration that would allow mostly Muslim refugees rejected by Australia to be resettled in the United States was still on, despite President Donald Trump dubbing the agreement “dumb” and vowing to review it.

The conflicting messages came hours after The Washington Post published a story detailing a tense exchange between Mr. Trump and Mr. Turnbull during their first telephone call as national leaders.

The newspaper reported that during the call, an angry Trump dubbed the agreement “the worst deal ever” and accused Mr. Turnbull of seeking to export the “next Boston bombers” — a reference to Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, U.S. citizens born in Kyrgyzstan who set off two bombs at the 2013 Boston marathon.

Mr. Turnbull declined to comment on the report, which also said Mr. Trump abruptly ended the expected hour-long conversation after 25 minutes as the Australian attempted to steer the conversation to other topics.

“It’s better that these things, these conversations, are conducted candidly, frankly, privately,” Mr. Turnbull told reporters. Later, however, he denied during an interview with Sydney radio station 2GB that Mr. Trump had hung up on him, saying the conversation had ended “courteously.”

Mr. Turnbull told reporters the strength of the relationship between the two nations was evident in that Mr. Trump had agreed to honour the deal to resettle refugees from among around 1,600 asylum seekers, most of whom are on island camps on the Pacific nations of Nauru and Papua New Guinea.



Australia has refused to accept them and instead pays for them to be housed on the islands.

“I can assure you the relationship is very strong,” Mr. Turnbull said. “The fact we received the assurance that we did, the fact that it was confirmed, the very extensive engagement we have with the new administration underlines the closeness of the alliance. But as Australians know me very well, I stand up for Australia in every forum public or private.”

Yet shortly after Mr. Turnbull made those comments to reporters, Mr. Trump took to Twitter to slam the deal.

“Do you believe it? The Obama Administration agreed to take thousands of illegal immigrants from Australia. Why?” Mr. Trump tweeted. “I will study this dumb deal!”

Mr. Trump who, a day before the conversation with Mr. Turnbull, had signed an executive order suspending the admission of refugees, complained during the call that he was “going to get killed” politically by the deal, the newspaper reported, citing anonymous officials.

“I don’t want these people,” he reportedly said. Mr. Trump also told Mr. Turnbull that he had spoken to four world leaders that day and that, “This is the worst call by far.”

Mixed messages

There have been mixed messages from Washington all week on the state of the agreement. White House spokesman Sean Spicer confirmed on Wednesday that Mr. Trump had agreed to honour the deal.

But a White House statement sent to Australian Broadcasting Corp. on Thursday said, “The President is still considering whether or not he will move forward with this deal at this time.”

The State Department said in a statement later on Thursday that the U.S. would honor the agreement “out of respect for close ties to our Australian ally and friend.”

“President Trump’s decision to honor the refugee agreement has not changed and Spokesman Spicer’s comments stand,” the State Department said.

The ABC spoke to senior Australian government sources, who said The Washington Post report was “substantially accurate.”

Australian officials said the conversation was “robust” and “shorter than expected,” while one Minister told the ABC that “Trump hates this deal.”

Opposition leader Bill Shorten called on Mr. Turnbull to be open about his interaction with Mr. Trump, saying The Washington Post version of the call was worrying.

“We shouldn’t be finding out about what’s happening to Australian policy through the news of foreign countries,” Mr. Shorten said.

Mr. Turnbull has likened himself to Mr. Trump, in that both are wealthy businessmen who came to politics late in life. Mr. Turnbull also has a reputation for blunt conversation and tough negotiations behind closed doors. He has resisted pressure this week to join other Western leaders in condemning Mr. Trump’s temporary ban of immigrants from seven Muslim-majority countries.

“When I have frank advice to give to an American President, I give it privately, as good friends should, as wise Prime Ministers do when they want to ensure they are best able to protect Australians and Australia’s national interest,” Mr. Turnbull told reporters on Tuesday.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NGT terminates chairmen of pollution control boards in 10 states (downtoearth,)

Cracking the whip on 10 State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) for ad-hoc appointments, the National Green Tribunal has ordered the termination of Chairpersons of these regulatory authorities. The concerned states are Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Kerala, Rajasthan, Telangana, Haryana, Maharashtra and Manipur. The order was given last week by the principal bench of the NGT, chaired by Justice Swatanter Kumar. The recent order of June 8, 2017, comes as a follow-up to an NGT judgment given in August 2016. In that judgment, the NGT had issued directions on appointments of Chairmen and Member Secretaries of the SPCBs, emphasising on crucial roles they have in pollution control and abatement. It then specified required qualifications as well as tenure of the authorities. States were required to act on the orders within three months and frame Rules for appointment [See Box: Highlights of the NGT judgment of 2016 on criteria for SPCB chairperson appointment]. Having

High dose of Vitamin C and B3 can kill colon cancer cells: study (downtoearth)

In a first, a team of researchers has found that high doses of Vitamin C and niacin or Vitamin B3 can kill cancer stem cells. A study published in Cell Biology International showed the opposing effects of low and high dose of vitamin C and vitamin B3 on colon cancer stem cells. Led by Bipasha Bose and Sudheer Shenoy, the team found that while low doses (5-25 micromolar) of Vitamin C and B3 proliferate colon cancer stem cells, high doses (100 to 1,000 micromolar) killed cancer stem cells. Such high doses of vitamins can only be achieved through intravenous injections in colon cancer patients. The third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, colon cancer can be prevented by an intake of dietary fibre and lifestyle changes. While the next step of the researchers is to delineate the mechanisms involved in such opposing effects, they also hope to establish a therapeutic dose of Vitamin C and B3 for colon cancer stem cell therapy. “If the therapeutic dose gets validated under in vivo

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”. The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya. It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests. The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach i