Skip to main content

EU must close all 315 coal-fired power plants by 2030 to meet climate goals: study (downtoearth)

If all the 315 coal plants in Europe complete their natural lifespan, the EU nations will overshoot their carbon emissions target for coal by 85 per cent, according to a report by Climate Analytics—a Berlin-based think tank. The report urges the EU to stop using coal for power generation by 2030.

Currently, the use of coal is declining by about one per cent a year in Europe. However, it still generates 25 per cent of the continent’s power, contributing one-fifth of greenhouse gas emissions.

“Not only would existing coal plants exceed the EU’s emissions budget, but the 11 planned and announced plants would raise EU emissions to almost twice the levels required to keep warming to the Paris agreement’s long-term temperature goal,” said Michiel Schaeffer, Climate Analytics science director.

There’s already a concern over diesel cars in the EU producing emissions about five times higher than the permissible limit.

This report will be a part of the review document on EU’s Paris targets in 2018. There’s a possibility of the EU raising its emission reduction target to make it in sync with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5℃ as agreed at Paris.

Artur Runge-Metzger, the EU’s lead negotiator at the Paris talks, said that the a 95 per cent emissions cut would be needed by 2050 to limit warming to 1.5°C, which is significantly higher than the 80 per cent pledged in Paris.

While the UK has Europe’s third highest capacity for coal, Germany and Poland, together, produce 54 per cent of the EU’s total emissions from coal-fired power plants.

Challenge for UK

The UK, on February 8, recommitted to a coal phase-out by 2025.  But “capacity payments” to seven coal plants worth £453m in the next four years will certainly take the country on the wrong track.

In the first week of February, the UK government granted another £78 million to keep coal plants open next year. Out of that, £10-million subsidy has been given to Aberthaw—a coal-fired power plant which produced breached the legal limit for nitrogen oxide for seven years. Subsidies for fossil fuel capacity do expose double standards in UK’s approach.

Challenge for Germany and Poland

Germany is one of the six G20 nations failing to take action in line with their Paris Agreement pledges. Along with the UK, France and Italy, Germany has witnessed the highest numbers of years of life lost (YLL) due to exposure to PM2.5 concentrations. The country is postponing its coal phase-out plans until elections later this year. Meanwhile, Poland is preparing a legal challenge to the EU’s climate policy. It wants to plant trees to offset coal emissions and has plans to apply experimental carbon capture and storage technology (CCS) some day.  Environmentalists doubt whether developing carbon sink potential of forests alone can help Poland achieve the necessary reductions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NGT terminates chairmen of pollution control boards in 10 states (downtoearth,)

Cracking the whip on 10 State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) for ad-hoc appointments, the National Green Tribunal has ordered the termination of Chairpersons of these regulatory authorities. The concerned states are Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Kerala, Rajasthan, Telangana, Haryana, Maharashtra and Manipur. The order was given last week by the principal bench of the NGT, chaired by Justice Swatanter Kumar. The recent order of June 8, 2017, comes as a follow-up to an NGT judgment given in August 2016. In that judgment, the NGT had issued directions on appointments of Chairmen and Member Secretaries of the SPCBs, emphasising on crucial roles they have in pollution control and abatement. It then specified required qualifications as well as tenure of the authorities. States were required to act on the orders within three months and frame Rules for appointment [See Box: Highlights of the NGT judgment of 2016 on criteria for SPCB chairperson appointment]. Having

High dose of Vitamin C and B3 can kill colon cancer cells: study (downtoearth)

In a first, a team of researchers has found that high doses of Vitamin C and niacin or Vitamin B3 can kill cancer stem cells. A study published in Cell Biology International showed the opposing effects of low and high dose of vitamin C and vitamin B3 on colon cancer stem cells. Led by Bipasha Bose and Sudheer Shenoy, the team found that while low doses (5-25 micromolar) of Vitamin C and B3 proliferate colon cancer stem cells, high doses (100 to 1,000 micromolar) killed cancer stem cells. Such high doses of vitamins can only be achieved through intravenous injections in colon cancer patients. The third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, colon cancer can be prevented by an intake of dietary fibre and lifestyle changes. While the next step of the researchers is to delineate the mechanisms involved in such opposing effects, they also hope to establish a therapeutic dose of Vitamin C and B3 for colon cancer stem cell therapy. “If the therapeutic dose gets validated under in vivo

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”. The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya. It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests. The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach i