Skip to main content

Honduras emerges as most dangerous country for environmental activists (downtoearth,)

Honduras is the deadliest country in the world for environmental activism. A probe by international watchdog, Global Witness, says more than 120 activists have been killed since 2010 for opposing the destruction of natural resources. In March 2016, well-known activist Berta Cáceres, was assassinated inside her home after being followed and threatened for long. The recipient of the prestigious Goldman Environmental Prize, Cáceres was a leading land rights defender.

In a shocking revelation, the Global Witness report names the president of the country’s ruling party, Gladis Aurora López, as one of the high-ranking politicians implicated in crackdowns on land defenders. It also urges the United States to review its support in the form of pumping huge amounts of dollars into Honduras despite human rights violations.

In majority of the cases involving threats and killings, attackers are not held accountable. As several members of indigenous communities point out in the report, they roam about freely. Victims and their families are often denied protection and justice they deserve. The 1.27 million-strong indigenous population has been sacrificed in the name of unprecedented “development” in Honduras, the report adds.

Billy Kyte, campaigner at Global Witness, said, “In Honduras and across the world environmental defenders are being shot dead in broad daylight, kidnapped, threatened or tried as terrorists for standing in the way of so-called ‘development’.”

A land of conflicts

Located between Guatemala and Nicaragua on the Caribbean coast, Honduras boasts of rich forests and valuable minerals. However, the wealth is enjoyed by a small section of the population and the rural poor are often ignored and sidelined in the name of economic growth. Honduras has the highest level of inequality in Latin America, with around six out of ten households in rural areas living on less than US $2.50 per day, the report says.

Routine conflicts over mining and hydropower projects are the biggest drivers of deaths among indigenous groups and rural communities, who dare to stand up for their rights. The report points out that bribery, lack of transparency in dealings and disregard of the law are rampant in the country. Land use problems and “clashing conceptions of development” fuel conflicts not only in Honduras, but in entire Latin America and Central America. On one hand, large landowners, government and companies push for resource extraction models with full force of the law on their side, and on the other hand, local communities fight to conserve their environments with little legal protection, Chris Moye, a campaigner with Global witness told Down To Earth earlier.

“Our investigations reveal how Honduras’ political and business elites are using corrupt and criminal means to cash in on the country’s natural wealth, and are enlisting the support of state forces to murder and terrorise the communities who dare to stand in their way,” Kyte said.

There are several reasons as to why Central and South America have the highest number of deaths of activists. Earlier information given to Down To Earth by a Global Witness campaigner via mail shows that because of a vibrant civil society that monitors killings of activists, there is more information available on the issue. Another factor is impunity and corruption in law enforcement agencies and judicial systems remains unaddressed. This is the reason why the killings never stop.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NGT terminates chairmen of pollution control boards in 10 states (downtoearth,)

Cracking the whip on 10 State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) for ad-hoc appointments, the National Green Tribunal has ordered the termination of Chairpersons of these regulatory authorities. The concerned states are Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Kerala, Rajasthan, Telangana, Haryana, Maharashtra and Manipur. The order was given last week by the principal bench of the NGT, chaired by Justice Swatanter Kumar. The recent order of June 8, 2017, comes as a follow-up to an NGT judgment given in August 2016. In that judgment, the NGT had issued directions on appointments of Chairmen and Member Secretaries of the SPCBs, emphasising on crucial roles they have in pollution control and abatement. It then specified required qualifications as well as tenure of the authorities. States were required to act on the orders within three months and frame Rules for appointment [See Box: Highlights of the NGT judgment of 2016 on criteria for SPCB chairperson appointment]. Having

High dose of Vitamin C and B3 can kill colon cancer cells: study (downtoearth)

In a first, a team of researchers has found that high doses of Vitamin C and niacin or Vitamin B3 can kill cancer stem cells. A study published in Cell Biology International showed the opposing effects of low and high dose of vitamin C and vitamin B3 on colon cancer stem cells. Led by Bipasha Bose and Sudheer Shenoy, the team found that while low doses (5-25 micromolar) of Vitamin C and B3 proliferate colon cancer stem cells, high doses (100 to 1,000 micromolar) killed cancer stem cells. Such high doses of vitamins can only be achieved through intravenous injections in colon cancer patients. The third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, colon cancer can be prevented by an intake of dietary fibre and lifestyle changes. While the next step of the researchers is to delineate the mechanisms involved in such opposing effects, they also hope to establish a therapeutic dose of Vitamin C and B3 for colon cancer stem cell therapy. “If the therapeutic dose gets validated under in vivo

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”. The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya. It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests. The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach i