Skip to main content

Impact of climate change on wildlife far greater than we thought: study (downtoearth)

Have ecologists and conservation groups underestimated the impact of climate change on wildlife? A recent review of the scientific literature suggests so. In one of the first such attempts at quantifying the number of species whose populations have already been affected by climate change, a collaborative research found out that 700 bird and mammal species were affected by climate change.

“We are massively underreporting what is going on,” James Watson, director of science and research initiatives at the Wildlife Conservation Society, and also the co-author of the study.

Extent of threat

The research, published in the journal Nature Climate Change, estimates that 47 per cent of mammals and 23 per cent of birds on the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s (UCN) Red List of Threatened Species have been negatively affected by climate change.

A team of researchers from Australia, Italy and Britain went through 130 studies (published between 1990 and 2015) that documented a species that was affected or not by changes in climate. Each of those more than 2,000 species was categorised based on the effect: negative, positive, unchanged or mixed.

Of the 873 mammal species studied, 414 were affected by climate change. Elephants, primates and marsupials were among the most vulnerable. Out of 1,272 bird species looked at, 298 birds are found experiencing negative effects. Birds living at high altitudes are among the hardest hit.

Number of species studied

Number of species affected

Mammal - 873

414

Birds – 1,272

298

Total – 2,145

712

 It is to be noted that mammals and birds represent only a small percentage of the biodiversity on Earth.

How does impact vary in different species?

According to Watson, most studies, while assessing the effects of climate change on flora and fauna, look at what might happen to a population 50 or 100 years down the line. The problem with such forecasts, Watson argued, is that they are not helpful “for the here and now and what policymakers can do”.

The analysis suggests that climate change can diminish the ability of mammals to successfully exploit natural resources, especially those species that are less able to adapt to changing ecological conditions. Climate change, however, can disrupt migration patterns of both birds and mammals and shrink vital habitat. Slow reproductive rates also make primates and elephants vulnerable to global warming.

What’s the need of the hour?

Affirming that climate change is not a future threat anymore, Watson called for improving assessments of the impacts of climate change on species right now. “We need to communicate this to wider public and we need to ensure key decisions makers know that something significant needs to happen now to stop species going extinct," he added.

Since climate change is going to get worse, the world leaders need to reduce carbon emissions in and limit global temperature rise to 2°C. Nearly 200 countries committed to do their bit in 2016 Paris climate agreement.

For Watson, “the big thing” is “not making climate change a future threat, but prioritising climate-smart actions now”.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cloud seeding

Demonstrating the function of the flare rack that carries silver iodide for cloud-seeding through an aircraft. 
Water is essential for life on the earth. Precipitation from the skies is the only source for it. India and the rest of Asia are dependent on the monsoons for rains. While the South West Monsoon is the main source for India as a whole, Tamil Nadu and coastal areas of South Andhra Pradesh get the benefit of the North East Monsoon, which is just a less dependable beat on the reversal of the South West Monsoon winds.

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”.

The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya.

It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests.

The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach it in …

India’s criminal wastage: over 10 million works under MGNREGA incomplete or abandoned (hindu)

In the last three and half years, the rate of work completion under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) has drastically declined, leading to wastage of public money and leaving villages more prone to drought. This could also be a reason for people moving out of the programme.

At a time when more than one-third of India’s districts are reeling under a drought-like situation due to deficit rainfall, here comes another bad news. The works started under the MGNREGA—close to 80 per cent related to water conservation, irrigation and land development—are increasingly not being completed or in practice, abandoned.

Going by the data (as on October 12) in the Ministry of Rural Development’s website, which tracks progress of MGNREGA through a comprehensive MIS, 10.4 million works have not been completed since April 2014. In the last three and half years, 39.7 million works were started under the programme. Going by the stipulation under the programme, close to 7…