Skip to main content

Trump's executive order sounds death knell for Paris climate pact (downtoearth,)

US President Donald Trump’s executive order on “promoting energy independence and economic growth” is set to destroy his former counterpart Barack Obama’s green legacy.

Trump’s order, which was signed on Tuesday, literally starts the process of dismantling the Paris Agreement—the landmark international pact adopted in 2015 to fight climate change.

Stating that “my administration would put an end to war on coal”, Trump’s executive order lifts the ban on federal leasing for coal production. It also lifts restrictions on production of oil, natural gas, clean coal and shale energy. The big question is will this move put an end to war against climate change?

By this order, the Trump administration, known for its skepticism on climate change, has overturned Obama’s policies on climate change. It has revoked many of the former president’s climate policies.

It also calls for immediate reviewing of the Clean Power Plan (CPP), which was at the core of Obama’s climate action plan to cut down emissions. Earlier, the budget decided to eliminate funding for the CPP. The CPP is literally over with this order.

The CPP regulation aims to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from US power plants by 32 per cent below their 2005 emissions level by 2030. Internationally, as part of its climate commitments, the US has pledged to reduce its emissions by a weak target of 26-28 per cent by 2025 against the 2005 levels.

Earlier in its budget, the Trump administration cancelled its funding of the global Green Climate Fund (GCF), which is meant to help developing countries address climate change.

With the budget declaration and current executive order, it is evident that the US has gone back on its climate commitments.

Key features of the executive order

The order revokes moratorium on coal mining on US federal lands. This will lead to increasing production and consumption of coal
It calls for immediate review of all agency actions and cancels, revises or revokes any rule or action that potentially burdens the development of domestic energy resources
It revokes six previous presidential executive orders under Obama’s administration, including the one on preparing the United States for the impacts of climate change, and also the memorandum for the power sector carbon pollution standards. The US power sector is the major emitter of greenhouse gases. In 2015, it alone was responsible for emitting 2 billion tonnes of CO2.
It revokes the climate action plan strategy to reduce methane emissions
It initiates an immediate review of the CPP initiative.
What this means for the US

The US has clearly signaled its intention of completely fossilising its economy, implying reckless production and consumption of fossil fuels, leading to increased carbon emissions globally.

Trump’s speech, as he signed the executive order, focused on eliminating federal overreach and prioritising American jobs over addressing climate change. Accordingly, the strategy of restoring or increasing jobs is the development of domestic sources of energy. However, market trends reveal that there is an upsurge in jobs in the clean energy sector and in this regard Trump’s decision could actually prove to be counter-productive.

Who will lead the climate efforts?

In the current political muddle that the European Union (EU) is facing, it is unlikely that the EU, though a leader in the climate change issue earlier, would immediately step into the driver’s seat at this juncture. China has shown willingness to take up leadership role, but the international community waits to see how it tackles climate change domestically and internationally, and also what it does to improve its credibility. There is uncertainty on who would lead a country or a coalition of countries, one has to wait and watch.

What about the Paris Agreement

The US administration has not indicated any immediate plan to withdraw out of the Paris Agreement. It will thus be part of the negotiations and hamper the progress towards addressing climate change. This is substantiated by the nomination of climate skeptic and ExxonMobil chief Rex Tillerson as the Secretary of State, who will also serve as the chief climate negotiator.

Further, the executive order of the US sets a bad precedence for other countries that may also follow the US’ footsteps and dilute their climate actions or choose to opt out of the Paris climate deal.

Considering the increasing frequency and intensity of climate-related impacts, ideally the US, being the largest historical emitter, should revamp its energy administration and scale up its ambitions.

On the other hand, the US under Trump, has completely shrugged off its responsibility to address climate change and has chosen to have a fossil fuel-based economy and back off on its climate commitments of emission cuts and finance.

The US failing to accomplish its climate targets would mean that achieving the objective of the Paris Agreement to stay within the safe temperature limits of 2 degrees Celsius and strive for 1.5 degrees Celsius would be next to impossible now. The onus then falls on other countries to heavily scale up their climate efforts and try to save the planet.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cloud seeding

Demonstrating the function of the flare rack that carries silver iodide for cloud-seeding through an aircraft. 
Water is essential for life on the earth. Precipitation from the skies is the only source for it. India and the rest of Asia are dependent on the monsoons for rains. While the South West Monsoon is the main source for India as a whole, Tamil Nadu and coastal areas of South Andhra Pradesh get the benefit of the North East Monsoon, which is just a less dependable beat on the reversal of the South West Monsoon winds.

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”.

The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya.

It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests.

The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach it in …

Indian Polity Elections (MCQ )

1. Who of the following has the responsibility of the registration of voters
a) Individual voters
b) Government
c) Election commission
d) Corporations


2. Democracy exists in India, without peoples participation and co operation democracy will fail. This implies that
a) Government should compel people to participate and cooperate with it
b) People from the government
c) People should participate and cooperate with the government
d) India should opt for the presidential system


3. Which of the following are not the functions of the election commission
1) Conduct of election for the post of the speaker and the deputy speaker, Lok sabha and the deputy chairman, Rajya sabha
2) Conduct of elections to the state legislative assemblies
3) Deciding on all doubts and disputes arising out of elections

a) 1 and 2
b) 1 and 3
c) 2 and 3
d) 2

4. Which of the following electoral systems have not been adopted for various elections in India
1) System of direct elections on the basis of adult suffrage
2…