Skip to main content

As Rajasthan government stops buying mustard, farmers resort to distress sellin\ (downtoearth,)

There are 93 markets in Rajasthan where mustard is being sold below MSP. Reluctance of the state government to purchase mustard on MSP has triggered distress selling.
There are total 293 markets in India where mustard is sold at below MSP. Besides Rajasthan, states such as Madhya Pradesh (72), Uttar Pradesh (63), Gujarat (32) and Haryana (14) have large number of markets where mustard is sold below MSP. In other states, such markets are in single digit.

Markets across States as on April 1, 2017

The minimum support price fixed by the Indian government for mustard is Rs 3700 per quintal, including bonus of Rs 100. But farmers are forced to sell it between Rs 2800 and Rs 3400. In March 2017, more than two million tonnes of mustard reached the markets in Rajasthan.
Rajasthan contributes 50 per cent of the total mustard production in the country. In 2016-17, the mustard production of Rajasthan has been projected at 3.73 million tonnes (MT), whereas average production of the country is around 7.4 MT.
Centre vs State conflict impacting farmers
In November 2016, the Centre had issued a circular to Rajasthan government stating that the union government will no longer bear the market fee and VAT (value added tax) on oilseeds procured on minimum support price (MSP). Collectively, VAT and market fee is 3.5 per cent of the MSP per quintal. 
“Because of such a circular, state government stopped procuring groundnuts,” says Rampal Jat, a Jaipur-based farmer leader. “Now mustard procurement is also in limbo. Farmers are directly affected in the fight between the state and the Centre,” he adds. The MSP of mustard is already less than the cost of cultivation, and on top of that, the government procurement is not happening.
MSP far below expectation
This year, MSP was fixed based on oil content of mustard. The seeds, having oil content of 35 per cent, 42 per cent and 53 per cent respectively, would be entitled to get Rs 3600, Rs 3982 and Rs 4283 per quintal. Additionally, there is a provision of Rs 100 per quintal as bonus.

MSP set as per oil content 

“State government had sent recommendation to the union government for keeping MSP at Rs 4000, keeping in mind the increasing cost of production. But the union government ignored it,” says Jat.
“Besides not getting MSP, the Rajasthan farmers are also dissatisfied with the fact that there’s no proper machine in the markets to measure oil percentage in seeds,” he adds.
Oilseeds scenario across the country
The edible oils constitute 55 per cent of India’s total agriculture import bill, which comes around Rs 69000 crore. Pulses constitute around 16 per cent. India needs to tap this opportunity of encouraging farmers to make country self-sustainable.
The production of oilseeds in 2016-17 is 10 per cent higher than average production: 33.6 MT as opposed to 30 million tonnes. Two consecutive years of drought dramatically reduced the production. In 2014-15, the production fell down to 27.5 MT, followed by 25.25 MT in 2015-16.
The main producers of oilseeds are Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Gujarat and Maharashtra. They constitute more than 60 per cent of total production of oilseeds. The other important states are Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, Uttar Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh.
Rajasthan has 18 per cent of total area in the country under oilseeds production, after Madhya Pradesh (26 per cent) and Maharashtra (16.5 per cent).

Popular posts from this blog

Cloud seeding

Demonstrating the function of the flare rack that carries silver iodide for cloud-seeding through an aircraft. 
Water is essential for life on the earth. Precipitation from the skies is the only source for it. India and the rest of Asia are dependent on the monsoons for rains. While the South West Monsoon is the main source for India as a whole, Tamil Nadu and coastal areas of South Andhra Pradesh get the benefit of the North East Monsoon, which is just a less dependable beat on the reversal of the South West Monsoon winds.

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”.

The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya.

It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests.

The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach it in …

Indian Polity Elections (MCQ )

1. Who of the following has the responsibility of the registration of voters
a) Individual voters
b) Government
c) Election commission
d) Corporations

2. Democracy exists in India, without peoples participation and co operation democracy will fail. This implies that
a) Government should compel people to participate and cooperate with it
b) People from the government
c) People should participate and cooperate with the government
d) India should opt for the presidential system

3. Which of the following are not the functions of the election commission
1) Conduct of election for the post of the speaker and the deputy speaker, Lok sabha and the deputy chairman, Rajya sabha
2) Conduct of elections to the state legislative assemblies
3) Deciding on all doubts and disputes arising out of elections

a) 1 and 2
b) 1 and 3
c) 2 and 3
d) 2

4. Which of the following electoral systems have not been adopted for various elections in India
1) System of direct elections on the basis of adult suffrage