Skip to main content

After Dave, what does future hold for GM Mustard? (downtoearth)

On May 11, the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC), a body of the Environment Ministry that evaluates genetically modified crops, recommended the commercial use of GM mustard. India was just a step away from allowing adoption of a genetically modified food crop for the first time. The recommendations of the technical committee were pending approval from the Union Environment Minister Anil Madhav Dave who passed away today (May 18).

While those endorsing GM Mustard (Dhara Mustard Hybrid 11) believe that this transgenic crop is resistant to pests and diseases and can generate better yields, the poor experience of BT cotton, the only other GM crop permitted in India, has made farmers and agricultural experts more sceptical.

However, GM crops are at the core of Modi government’s plans for pushing growth in the biotechnology sector. The government is also putting its bets on GM Mustard for boosting farm productivity in India.

Decision on hold

A parliamentary standing committee, headed by Congress leader Renuka Chowdhury, has reportedly asked the environment ministry to hold clearance for commercial use of GM mustard crop as the panel is still reviewing the issue after a number of civil society groups complained against it.

According to sources, there’s a possibility of the new environment minister delaying a decision until the Supreme Court gives its verdict in cases that question the safety of GM crops. No date has been issued by the court for giving its verdict.

Questions that need to be answered

Union Minister for Science and Technology, Harsh Vardhan, who has been given an additional charge of the Environment Ministry after the death of Dave, not only has to respond to allegations that the entire process of approving GM Mustard was unscientific but also answer the questions being raised on how the GM crop can increase domestic production of edible oil and reduce import bill, when it itself is not high-yielding.

Reports are already doing rounds about the anti-GM Mustard activists planning to brief Harsh Vardhan over their reservations on commercial use of the crop.

Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar recently raised concerns over the GM technology being commercialised by the multinational seed companies, leaving millions of farmers at the mercy of these seed companies. Moreover, there’s no provision for liability and compensation in the Seed Act if such risky technologies cause damage to farmers and the environment.

As the cry for rejecting GM Mustard in the public interest grows louder, government has now been challenged to participate in a public debate on the use of such genetically modified crops. According to Devinder Sharma, a renowned food and trade policy analyst, low productivity has never been a problem with mustard, but the failure to get at least the minimum support price (MSP) that the government announces.

The new minister has to allay concerns of mustard-growing states, farmers’ organisations and organic farming communities, just like Dave had assured while meeting the protesters a day before he passed away.

More importantly, he has to come up with a decision before the next sowing season, which is just four months away.


Popular posts from this blog

Cloud seeding

Demonstrating the function of the flare rack that carries silver iodide for cloud-seeding through an aircraft. 
Water is essential for life on the earth. Precipitation from the skies is the only source for it. India and the rest of Asia are dependent on the monsoons for rains. While the South West Monsoon is the main source for India as a whole, Tamil Nadu and coastal areas of South Andhra Pradesh get the benefit of the North East Monsoon, which is just a less dependable beat on the reversal of the South West Monsoon winds.

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”.

The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya.

It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests.

The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach it in …

Indian Polity Elections (MCQ )

1. Who of the following has the responsibility of the registration of voters
a) Individual voters
b) Government
c) Election commission
d) Corporations

2. Democracy exists in India, without peoples participation and co operation democracy will fail. This implies that
a) Government should compel people to participate and cooperate with it
b) People from the government
c) People should participate and cooperate with the government
d) India should opt for the presidential system

3. Which of the following are not the functions of the election commission
1) Conduct of election for the post of the speaker and the deputy speaker, Lok sabha and the deputy chairman, Rajya sabha
2) Conduct of elections to the state legislative assemblies
3) Deciding on all doubts and disputes arising out of elections

a) 1 and 2
b) 1 and 3
c) 2 and 3
d) 2

4. Which of the following electoral systems have not been adopted for various elections in India
1) System of direct elections on the basis of adult suffrage