Skip to main content

New tax regime under GST discourages aerated beverage consumption (downtoearth,)

As aerated drinks are in the category of demerit goods, they come under the highest GST slab of 28 per cent. Credit: Max PixelAs aerated drinks are in the category of demerit goods, they come under the highest GST slab of 28 per cent. Credit: Max Pixel
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) council agreed on May 18 to fix the compensation cess rate at 12 per cent for aerated beverages. As they are in the category of demerit goods or sin goods and luxury goods, they come under the highest GST slab of 28 per cent. It means, aerated beverages will attract a total tax of 40 per cent (28+12).

“The changed tax structure is likely to have an incremental impact on the price of aerated beverages overall in the country. Impact will vary from one state to another on account of difference in the prevailing tax structure in the states,” says Rajat Mittal, an Indirect Tax lawyer and Senior Associate at Advaita Legal.

In the existing tax regime, two taxes: central excise (central tax) and VAT, which is specific to the state, are levied. The GST is a tax levied across goods and services to subsume indirect taxes such as sales tax and service tax. The new tax has been upsetting for the industry body, Indian Beverage Association (IBA), which has urged the government to reconsider the new rate. “The combined rate of CENVAT and State VAT rates reach 34 per cent in eight states in the country. A 40 per cent increase in the central excise duty (from existing 21 per cent) would hit the industry hard,” said IBA in its recent statement.

Increasing the tax on aerated beverages is a significant move to discourage its consumption in India. As per the statistics of Neilson India Pvt Ltd for 2016, the soft drink industry has seen a value growth of 11 per cent compound annual growth rate (CAGR) and a volume growth of five per cent CAGR over the past two years. It states that about 1.25 billion people in India drink 5.9 billion litres of soft drinks in a year. “Taxation is used to discourage or encourage certain classification of goods based on the need and requirement of the society. In view of public health interest and the ongoing debate against junk food, aerated beverages were kept in the category of sin goods to discourage its consumption by the government. This should be widely accepted,” says Vijay Sardana, Food Market expert based in Delhi.

Increased consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages is associated with risks of non-communicable diseases such as diabetes. “Although GST aims at making goods available to all at reasonable prices, aerated beverages, being unhealthy, should be treated no less than tobacco and cigarettes with high tax. This is a welcome move by the government to discourage the consumption of these drinks which are nothing but caffeinated water with sugar,” says Manjari Chandra, Consultant Therapeutic Nutritionist at Max Super Specialty, Saket.

High tax imposition on aerated beverages has been recognised as a public health intervention internationally that has led to a decline in consumer purchases. A study in Mexico released early this year found that purchases of taxed beverages decreased by an average of six per cent in 2014 and registered a 12 per cent decline by December 2014. This happened after Mexico introduced an excise tax of 1 peso per litre on sugar-sweetened beverages in January 2014.

New tax under GST has been fixed for about 1,211 items placed under different tax slabs: no tax, 5 per cent, 12 per cent, 18 per cent and 28 per cent. The majority of items are placed under the category of 18 per cent.  Other items under the category of demerit goods include chocolates without cocoa, waffles and wafers coated with chocolate and pan masala.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NGT terminates chairmen of pollution control boards in 10 states (downtoearth,)

Cracking the whip on 10 State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) for ad-hoc appointments, the National Green Tribunal has ordered the termination of Chairpersons of these regulatory authorities. The concerned states are Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Kerala, Rajasthan, Telangana, Haryana, Maharashtra and Manipur. The order was given last week by the principal bench of the NGT, chaired by Justice Swatanter Kumar. The recent order of June 8, 2017, comes as a follow-up to an NGT judgment given in August 2016. In that judgment, the NGT had issued directions on appointments of Chairmen and Member Secretaries of the SPCBs, emphasising on crucial roles they have in pollution control and abatement. It then specified required qualifications as well as tenure of the authorities. States were required to act on the orders within three months and frame Rules for appointment [See Box: Highlights of the NGT judgment of 2016 on criteria for SPCB chairperson appointment]. Having

High dose of Vitamin C and B3 can kill colon cancer cells: study (downtoearth)

In a first, a team of researchers has found that high doses of Vitamin C and niacin or Vitamin B3 can kill cancer stem cells. A study published in Cell Biology International showed the opposing effects of low and high dose of vitamin C and vitamin B3 on colon cancer stem cells. Led by Bipasha Bose and Sudheer Shenoy, the team found that while low doses (5-25 micromolar) of Vitamin C and B3 proliferate colon cancer stem cells, high doses (100 to 1,000 micromolar) killed cancer stem cells. Such high doses of vitamins can only be achieved through intravenous injections in colon cancer patients. The third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, colon cancer can be prevented by an intake of dietary fibre and lifestyle changes. While the next step of the researchers is to delineate the mechanisms involved in such opposing effects, they also hope to establish a therapeutic dose of Vitamin C and B3 for colon cancer stem cell therapy. “If the therapeutic dose gets validated under in vivo

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”. The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya. It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests. The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach i