Skip to main content

Putting out a fire with more smoke (.hindu )

Donald Trump may not face imminent impeachment, but he may find it difficult to get past Russiagate

In December 1987, Pat Nixon, the former First Lady, told her husband Richard, the disgraced former President of the United States, about the “great” performance of Donald Trump on the popular Phil Donahue TV show. Mr. Trump was then thinking of entering politics. Richard Nixon then sent a typewritten note to Mr. Trump, saying: “I did not see the program, but Mrs. Nixon told me you were great. As you can imagine, she is an expert on politics and she predicts that whenever you decide to run for office, you will be a winner!” Nobody knows if Mrs. Nixon was serious in her prediction. But in less than 30 years, she was proved right when Mr. Trump was elected the 45th President of the U.S. And history is so roguish that when it happened, it has with inescapable parallels with the second Nixon administration.

Four months into the chaotic Trump presidency, influential voices in Washington have already begun discussing the possibility of impeaching the President, whose associates are being probed for their alleged ties with Moscow.

Click Here!
A Nixonian move
If the Watergate scandal that doomed the Nixon presidency began with a break-in, in 1972, at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters at the Watergate office complex in Washington, the Russia scandal that’s engulfing the Trump presidency began with a cyberattack of DNC computer systems, in 2016, allegedly by Russian hackers. If Nixon’s decision to sack Archibald Cox, the special counsel who was investigating the Watergate allegations, in 1973, was a breaking point of his administration, Mr. Trump’s decision to sack Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) chief James Comey on May 9, at a time when the agency was conducting the investigation into the alleged Russian intervention in the presidential election, could be a breaking point of his administration. If the major charge against Nixon was attempting to obstruct justice in the Watergate probe, Mr. Trump is now facing the same allegations after a leaked Comey memo suggested that he had asked the FBI chief to shut the probe into the Russia connections of his aide Michael Flynn, who he had originally picked as his National Security Adviser.

Nixon was seen as a shrewd, intelligent politician with a massive support base among the conservatives. But he was so desperate to shut the investigation that he may have thought that firing Cox would allow him to take control of the developments surrounding the scandal. What happened was just the opposite. Both the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General refused to carry out the President’s order and quit the government. What was till then seen to be a scandal involving the President’s aides snowballed into a crisis threatening the presidency itself, turning both the American public and the lawmakers against Nixon, and leading to his eventual resignation a year later. Mr. Trump, as his actions and tweets repeatedly suggest, has neither Nixon’s shrewdness nor his political intelligence. But now he has to deal with a crisis of equal proportions. And unsurprisingly, with his impulsive rage and apparent lack of a coherent strategy, he is making matters a lot worse for himself.

A growing fire
Take the recent controversies. When Mr. Comey was fired, the White House initially said the decision was the Deputy Attorney General’s over the FBI chief’s poor handling of an investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server when she was Secretary of State, and that the President accepted it. Within hours, Mr. Trump contradicted this, saying he had decided to fire Mr. Comey irrespective of the Justice Department’s recommendation and also suggesting that the reason was the Russia probe. Similarly contradictory messages came out of the White House when a Washington Post report said Mr. Trump had shared classified information on the Islamic State with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov at an Oval Office meeting. H.R. McMaster, Mr. Trump’s National Security Adviser, first met the media saying the report was false. The next morning, Mr. Trump tweeted, re-emphasising his right to share intelligence with Russia, and indirectly authenticating the Post story. His U-turns are not new, but in a tenure-threatening crisis, his inability to present a coherent White House narrative to counter the allegations only exposes his incompetency. Then came the Comey memo leak which has dragged him deeper into Russiagate.

It doesn’t mean that Mr. Trump is facing imminent impeachment. The Republican Party controls both houses of Congress. But the crisis he is facing is huge and the way he’s handling it is extremely poor. It’s no longer about whether he knew about the “Russia links” of his aides but whether he tried to influence the investigation. America’s intelligence community, which the President compared to the Nazis in January, is fighting a shadow battle against him. He can’t control the leaks from his administration. He can’t even offer a holding counter-narrative. His, authority, both among the American public and within the U.S. political system, is clearly eroding. As Republican Senator Bob Corker put it, the Trump administration is “obviously in a downward spiral”.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NGT terminates chairmen of pollution control boards in 10 states (downtoearth,)

Cracking the whip on 10 State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) for ad-hoc appointments, the National Green Tribunal has ordered the termination of Chairpersons of these regulatory authorities. The concerned states are Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Kerala, Rajasthan, Telangana, Haryana, Maharashtra and Manipur. The order was given last week by the principal bench of the NGT, chaired by Justice Swatanter Kumar. The recent order of June 8, 2017, comes as a follow-up to an NGT judgment given in August 2016. In that judgment, the NGT had issued directions on appointments of Chairmen and Member Secretaries of the SPCBs, emphasising on crucial roles they have in pollution control and abatement. It then specified required qualifications as well as tenure of the authorities. States were required to act on the orders within three months and frame Rules for appointment [See Box: Highlights of the NGT judgment of 2016 on criteria for SPCB chairperson appointment]. Having

High dose of Vitamin C and B3 can kill colon cancer cells: study (downtoearth)

In a first, a team of researchers has found that high doses of Vitamin C and niacin or Vitamin B3 can kill cancer stem cells. A study published in Cell Biology International showed the opposing effects of low and high dose of vitamin C and vitamin B3 on colon cancer stem cells. Led by Bipasha Bose and Sudheer Shenoy, the team found that while low doses (5-25 micromolar) of Vitamin C and B3 proliferate colon cancer stem cells, high doses (100 to 1,000 micromolar) killed cancer stem cells. Such high doses of vitamins can only be achieved through intravenous injections in colon cancer patients. The third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, colon cancer can be prevented by an intake of dietary fibre and lifestyle changes. While the next step of the researchers is to delineate the mechanisms involved in such opposing effects, they also hope to establish a therapeutic dose of Vitamin C and B3 for colon cancer stem cell therapy. “If the therapeutic dose gets validated under in vivo

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”. The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya. It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests. The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach i