Skip to main content

Rich nations unwilling to respect UNFCCC principles at Bonn talks (downtoearth)

Negotiations on Day 5 of the climate talks at Bonn were overshadowed by developed countries taking a non-cooperative stance on various issues including Global Stocktake (GST), transparency framework, loss and damage and others

On GST, developed countries argued that means of implementation, a component of GST, should have a broader framing as it is in a broader context and be presented in the light of collective efforts. Their view clearly implies that the scope of means of implementation should include support provided by developing countries too. According to the principles and mandate of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), developed countries are required to provide means of support to developing countries in their efforts to switch to a low carbon economy scenario. Developed countries’ proposals to carry out the process of GST was also mainly mitigation-centric, said Saudi Arabia, speaking on behalf of the Arab Group.

With regard to the operationalisation of equity, while the developing countries showed keenness in having a firm interpretation of equity in the spirit of the UNFCCC, developed countries offered vague explanations about how they thought of equity in GST. Their interpretations of equity in GST were related to different voices in the process of GST and different sources of input in GST.

Further, developed countries were not interested in including loss and damage within the ambit of GST as proposed by some developing countries mainly falling within the Alliance of Small and Island States or AOSIS group. Principally, India is not against exclusion of loss and damage in GST though the official stance on GST does not reflect it.

Speaking on equity, India on Day 5 elaborated that it largely relates to the right of development and eradication of poverty. It said, “We need to understand how climate change has a bearing on equitable access to sustainable development.” Stressing on the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities, India said that common responsibilities are reflected in the submissions of Nationally Determined Contributions or NDCs by all Parties. However, differentiation in responsibilities should also be reflected. Its views were welcomed and endorsed by Brazil, speaking on behalf of Brazil, Uruguay and Argentina.

There is still much work and discussions that would be involved to discuss sources of input, modalities, the actors involved, operationalisation of equity, the issue of linkages, output and how it would help in raising ambition of the Parties.

On all agenda items falling under the Adhoc working group on the Paris Agreement or APA, developing countries, represented by G-77 and China, put forth at the contact group meeting that issues central to the developing countries were being given imbalanced treatment, lesser time and different methodological approaches. Developing countries pressed for equal treatment of mitigation and adaptation issues, and that the balance of treatment of transparency of action and transparency of support and the linkages between actions and support need to be recognized. They argued that the developed countries were re-interpreting the language of the UNFCCC to their interests and convenience. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NGT terminates chairmen of pollution control boards in 10 states (downtoearth,)

Cracking the whip on 10 State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) for ad-hoc appointments, the National Green Tribunal has ordered the termination of Chairpersons of these regulatory authorities. The concerned states are Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Kerala, Rajasthan, Telangana, Haryana, Maharashtra and Manipur. The order was given last week by the principal bench of the NGT, chaired by Justice Swatanter Kumar. The recent order of June 8, 2017, comes as a follow-up to an NGT judgment given in August 2016. In that judgment, the NGT had issued directions on appointments of Chairmen and Member Secretaries of the SPCBs, emphasising on crucial roles they have in pollution control and abatement. It then specified required qualifications as well as tenure of the authorities. States were required to act on the orders within three months and frame Rules for appointment [See Box: Highlights of the NGT judgment of 2016 on criteria for SPCB chairperson appointment]. Having

High dose of Vitamin C and B3 can kill colon cancer cells: study (downtoearth)

In a first, a team of researchers has found that high doses of Vitamin C and niacin or Vitamin B3 can kill cancer stem cells. A study published in Cell Biology International showed the opposing effects of low and high dose of vitamin C and vitamin B3 on colon cancer stem cells. Led by Bipasha Bose and Sudheer Shenoy, the team found that while low doses (5-25 micromolar) of Vitamin C and B3 proliferate colon cancer stem cells, high doses (100 to 1,000 micromolar) killed cancer stem cells. Such high doses of vitamins can only be achieved through intravenous injections in colon cancer patients. The third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, colon cancer can be prevented by an intake of dietary fibre and lifestyle changes. While the next step of the researchers is to delineate the mechanisms involved in such opposing effects, they also hope to establish a therapeutic dose of Vitamin C and B3 for colon cancer stem cell therapy. “If the therapeutic dose gets validated under in vivo

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”. The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya. It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests. The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach i