Skip to main content

SC orders Karnan to be medically examined (hindu)

Calcutta government doctors' board will examine Justice Karnan on May 4 and submit a report by May 8

Wondering whether Calcutta High Court judge Justice C.S. Karnan is “feigning mental imbalance”, a seven-judge Supreme Court Bench, led by Chief Justice of India J.S. Khehar, on Monday ordered him to be medically examined by a board of doctors in Kolkata.

The order was prompted by Justice Karnan’s statements to the media against the Bench and a recent ‘purported judicial order’ directing Chief Justice Khehar and seven Supreme Court judges to appear before him in Calcutta on May 1, 2017.

“The tenor of the press briefings, as also the purported order passed by him, indicate that he may not be in a position to defend himself in the present proceedings. We, therefore, consider it in the fitness of matters to direct him to be medically examined before proceeding with the matter,” the Bench ordered.



Hours after the SC order, Justice Karnan himself issued an order directing the Director General of Police of New Delhi to produce the seven judges before a psychiatric board.

He stated that the Supreme Court’s latest order was an “insult” to a Dalit judge.

“I further direct the Director General of Police, N. Delhi (New Delhi) to take all the accused judges…and produce them to a psychiatric medical board attached to the AIIMS Hospital, N.Delhi to conduct appropriate medical tests on the accused and submit a copy of the report on or before 7.5.2017 (May 7, 2017),” Justice Karnan said.

He stated that the Supreme Court’s latest order was not only a “harassment order” against his sanity but also an “insult.” “This kind of harassment order against my sanity is an additional insult to an innocent Dalit judge who is of sound health and mind,” he said. The judge also said that his wife and two sons, who are engineers, are “very much satisfied” with his physical and mental health.

Earlier in the Supreme Court, Attorney-General Mukul Rohatgi submitted that Justice Karnan’s conduct since the contempt proceedings started in February 8 this year was a “gross aggravation of contempt of the Supreme Court.”

Justice Karnan had passed orders in violation of the Supreme Court’s express direction to him to refrain from judicial and administrative work during the pendency of the current contempt proceedings.

“His order directed eight judges of the Supreme Court, including all My Lords to appear before him,” Mr. Rohatgi submitted.

“That is why he is not present here despite us ordering him to be so. He is waiting for us there [Kolkata],” Chief Justice Khehar responded.

The Bench ordered Justice Karnan to be examined by a board of government doctors in Kolkata on May 4 and ordered the DGP of West Bengal to depute police personnel for the purpose.

The court directed the board to submit its report by May 8, and scheduled a hearing on May 18.

It further directed courts, commissions or authorities to not take cognisance of any order passed by Justice Karnan after February 8, 2017.

The Bench, also comprising Justices Dipak Misra, J. Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi, P.C. Ghose and Kurian Joseph, disagreed with senior advocate K.K. Venugopal’s advice that since Justice Karnan was retiring in June, the contempt hearing should be deferred.

Popular posts from this blog

NGT terminates chairmen of pollution control boards in 10 states (downtoearth,)

Cracking the whip on 10 State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) for ad-hoc appointments, the National Green Tribunal has ordered the termination of Chairpersons of these regulatory authorities. The concerned states are Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Kerala, Rajasthan, Telangana, Haryana, Maharashtra and Manipur. The order was given last week by the principal bench of the NGT, chaired by Justice Swatanter Kumar. The recent order of June 8, 2017, comes as a follow-up to an NGT judgment given in August 2016. In that judgment, the NGT had issued directions on appointments of Chairmen and Member Secretaries of the SPCBs, emphasising on crucial roles they have in pollution control and abatement. It then specified required qualifications as well as tenure of the authorities. States were required to act on the orders within three months and frame Rules for appointment [See Box: Highlights of the NGT judgment of 2016 on criteria for SPCB chairperson appointment]. Having

High dose of Vitamin C and B3 can kill colon cancer cells: study (downtoearth)

In a first, a team of researchers has found that high doses of Vitamin C and niacin or Vitamin B3 can kill cancer stem cells. A study published in Cell Biology International showed the opposing effects of low and high dose of vitamin C and vitamin B3 on colon cancer stem cells. Led by Bipasha Bose and Sudheer Shenoy, the team found that while low doses (5-25 micromolar) of Vitamin C and B3 proliferate colon cancer stem cells, high doses (100 to 1,000 micromolar) killed cancer stem cells. Such high doses of vitamins can only be achieved through intravenous injections in colon cancer patients. The third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, colon cancer can be prevented by an intake of dietary fibre and lifestyle changes. While the next step of the researchers is to delineate the mechanisms involved in such opposing effects, they also hope to establish a therapeutic dose of Vitamin C and B3 for colon cancer stem cell therapy. “If the therapeutic dose gets validated under in vivo

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”. The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya. It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests. The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach i