Skip to main content

That illusion of retirement (.hindu )

Why the very idea of superannuation is not only outdated but also dangerous

Have you ever seen what happens to your elbow after it has been in a plaster cast for a while? The muscle becomes so weak it atrophies after not being in use for two weeks.

It’s the same with your brain. If you don’t use it, it will deteriorate quickly. Any many of those who retire at 60 or 65 are in the comfortable position that they don’t face a real challenge in life anymore like struggling how to earn a living or having to prove themselves in the workplace. But this comfort comes with a side effect, because research clearly shows that those who stop working at 65 and fully retire in the sense of not extensively engaging in alternative activities report a sharp decline in cognitive skills over the next years, whereas those in the same age group who continue to work or pursue other challenging tasks do not show these symptoms. And this affects a large part of life because nowadays we are not talking about a few years between retirement and passing away, but rather about decades. The question is how to use your full potential during the last quarter or even third of your life.

The mirage


The whole idea of retirement is not only outdated but it is wrong in the first place. Many in their 40s and 50s are working towards retiring with good savings. If you are so focussed on retirement for such a long time it indicates you are not really enjoying what you are doing now. Not every day at the workplace can be full of bliss, but if you learn to endure an unwanted situation for so long you will no longer know what your real needs are and how to realise them. If you educate your brain over many years not to pay attention to your current needs, how would you all of a sudden be able to do so after retirement? If you spend years building a ship and fantasising about the great freedom out at sea you may find that you eventually lost the courage to set sail once the ship is ready, not to mentions your sailing skills.

So retirement is often an illusion: it does not materialise in the freedom and happiness one imagined, and it is dangerous because if you avoid any real challenge it will lead to a rapid decline in your mental ability for the rest of your life.

How old you are


However, there is an alternative to an early decline of brainpower. There are people who are very active even in their 80s and 90s and whose brain functions match those of people less than half their age. Scientists call them Superagers, and they recommend that you continue “to work hard at something” if you want to age well. It doesn’t matter if you work as freelancer in your previous profession after official retirement or start something completely new like your own business or engage in volunteer work, as long as you really challenge yourself with it and leave your comfort zone. The concerned brain region associated with cognitive abilities responds to both physical and mental challenges. Ambitious physical exercise will result in the same positive results for your brain, whereas keeping yourself busy with Sudoku and crossword doesn’t have an anti-ageing effect on the brain. Jogging helps – brain jogging doesn’t. The most important aspect is your attitude. One has to cultivate a beginner’s mind and accept failure as a part of the game.

Whoever wants to become a Superager has to embrace the qualities of inquisitiveness, openness and determination. You must be ready to leave your comfort zone and willing to encounter unknown and possibly unpleasant situations. The actual activity depends entirely on your personality. Think about the 105-year-old cyclist, the 89-year-old job- seeker or the scientist in his 90s. If you prefer to live in your fully comprehensive cover world and strive to avoid everything unpleasant and challenging in life, you are contributing to your own decline. The choice is yours.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NGT terminates chairmen of pollution control boards in 10 states (downtoearth,)

Cracking the whip on 10 State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) for ad-hoc appointments, the National Green Tribunal has ordered the termination of Chairpersons of these regulatory authorities. The concerned states are Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Kerala, Rajasthan, Telangana, Haryana, Maharashtra and Manipur. The order was given last week by the principal bench of the NGT, chaired by Justice Swatanter Kumar. The recent order of June 8, 2017, comes as a follow-up to an NGT judgment given in August 2016. In that judgment, the NGT had issued directions on appointments of Chairmen and Member Secretaries of the SPCBs, emphasising on crucial roles they have in pollution control and abatement. It then specified required qualifications as well as tenure of the authorities. States were required to act on the orders within three months and frame Rules for appointment [See Box: Highlights of the NGT judgment of 2016 on criteria for SPCB chairperson appointment]. Having

High dose of Vitamin C and B3 can kill colon cancer cells: study (downtoearth)

In a first, a team of researchers has found that high doses of Vitamin C and niacin or Vitamin B3 can kill cancer stem cells. A study published in Cell Biology International showed the opposing effects of low and high dose of vitamin C and vitamin B3 on colon cancer stem cells. Led by Bipasha Bose and Sudheer Shenoy, the team found that while low doses (5-25 micromolar) of Vitamin C and B3 proliferate colon cancer stem cells, high doses (100 to 1,000 micromolar) killed cancer stem cells. Such high doses of vitamins can only be achieved through intravenous injections in colon cancer patients. The third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, colon cancer can be prevented by an intake of dietary fibre and lifestyle changes. While the next step of the researchers is to delineate the mechanisms involved in such opposing effects, they also hope to establish a therapeutic dose of Vitamin C and B3 for colon cancer stem cell therapy. “If the therapeutic dose gets validated under in vivo

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”. The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya. It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests. The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach i