Skip to main content

Coercive measures under Swachh Bharat Mission impinging on people’s freedom (downtoearth)

Prime Minister Narendra Modi aims at making India open defecation-free by October 2019. The government’s Swachh Bharat Mission (SBM) brought to forefront many success stories. But there is a flip side to this movement as well. Zafar Hussain, a 44-year-old social worker from Pratapgarh, Rajasthan was killed brutally by local civic officials after he objected to their photographing of his wife and daughter defecating in open, said the press release by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA) on June 19, 2017. With its head office in Delhi, JSA is a 'People's Health Movement' in the country, which is aimed at establishing health and equitable development through comprehensive primary health care and action on social determinants of health.

The Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation says that till date 64 per cent of households in rural India use toilet. This means, open defecation is practised by only 36 per cent of rural households. We have fascinating stories from Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim and Kerala, which have given up open defecation completely. There are success stories from different districts also. Several studies on sanitation sector show that motivating communities for building and using toilets have never been easy.

Many prefer to go out in the open—a habit extremely difficult to part with. To convince them, Community Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) approach was used. The pioneer of this movement is Kamal Kar, head of a Kolkata-based non-profit CLTS Foundation. He has not only used this approach to bring about behavioural change in different parts of India but also in different African countries. The approaches are non-violent and all about convincing people in a polite manner. Although there is an element of naming and shaming of offenders (people who practise open defecation), yet the method, which will be adopted, is decided by local communities and the final decision is taken by the individual only.

However, due to strict deadline of the SBM, the officials are now trying to coerce communities to stop open defecation and passing stringent laws. Thus, a top-down approach is hurting the basic principle of CLTS movement. Deepak Sanan, former Additional Chief Secretary, Government of Himachal Pradesh and advisor to the CLTS Foundation says that adopting a coercive approach to force people to have toilets may create a division within the community. “Shaming people in public, not marking students’ attendance in school and not allowing villagers to vote in local elections for defecating in the open are not the way to trigger a change in mindset,” adds Arundati Muralidharan of Water Aid, India.

This year, there were hoardings in different villages of Madhya Pradesh threatening death penalty to people defecating in open. In 2016, there were reports from Karnal district in Haryana where villagers were forced to pay fine of Rs 500. Every morning, Anganwadi workers, school teachers, health officials and elected panchayat representatives intimidate people defecating in open by blowing whistles and shining torches. These people were mainly poor landless labourers who could not afford toilets, say the media reports.

There were also reports from Dhamtari district of Chhattisgarh, one of the cleanest districts of India, where the government officials asked powerful village machineries to punish people if they are practising open defecation. The most commonly used form of punishment is withholding salaries of panchayat secretaries who fail to build toilets in their villages and preventing villagers from using their ration cards if they are not using the toilets.

Thus, such desperation to achieve targets for implementation is making people more hostile to safe sanitation. According to Sulakshana Nandi of JSA, the government should have taken an instant action on such incidence which happened in Rajasthan where a person was killed in the name of SBM. Such incidents are happening all around the country, Photography of women defecating in open should be stopped immediately, says Nandi. According to JSA, the government should redesign the process of behavioural change and not hurt the spirit of CLTS movement. The dignity of women has been challenged again and again for not using toilets.

Poor maintenance of toilets and unavailability of water have forced many to go out for relieving themselves, says JSA. Not only this, only toilets will not help the women, they need private bathing place. says Odisha-based non-profit Gram Vikas. A report of 2014 said that almost 38 per cent of girls in rural Bihar are forced to change their menstrual cloth or napkin in open and 55 per cent of womenfolk have to take bath outside household premises.

Now that the SBM is entering into the last and final phase, the mission should learn from the failures of family planning in mid-70s to avoid any backlash. Communities should not be threatened to practise safe sanitation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NGT terminates chairmen of pollution control boards in 10 states (downtoearth,)

Cracking the whip on 10 State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) for ad-hoc appointments, the National Green Tribunal has ordered the termination of Chairpersons of these regulatory authorities. The concerned states are Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Kerala, Rajasthan, Telangana, Haryana, Maharashtra and Manipur. The order was given last week by the principal bench of the NGT, chaired by Justice Swatanter Kumar. The recent order of June 8, 2017, comes as a follow-up to an NGT judgment given in August 2016. In that judgment, the NGT had issued directions on appointments of Chairmen and Member Secretaries of the SPCBs, emphasising on crucial roles they have in pollution control and abatement. It then specified required qualifications as well as tenure of the authorities. States were required to act on the orders within three months and frame Rules for appointment [See Box: Highlights of the NGT judgment of 2016 on criteria for SPCB chairperson appointment]. Having

High dose of Vitamin C and B3 can kill colon cancer cells: study (downtoearth)

In a first, a team of researchers has found that high doses of Vitamin C and niacin or Vitamin B3 can kill cancer stem cells. A study published in Cell Biology International showed the opposing effects of low and high dose of vitamin C and vitamin B3 on colon cancer stem cells. Led by Bipasha Bose and Sudheer Shenoy, the team found that while low doses (5-25 micromolar) of Vitamin C and B3 proliferate colon cancer stem cells, high doses (100 to 1,000 micromolar) killed cancer stem cells. Such high doses of vitamins can only be achieved through intravenous injections in colon cancer patients. The third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, colon cancer can be prevented by an intake of dietary fibre and lifestyle changes. While the next step of the researchers is to delineate the mechanisms involved in such opposing effects, they also hope to establish a therapeutic dose of Vitamin C and B3 for colon cancer stem cell therapy. “If the therapeutic dose gets validated under in vivo

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”. The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya. It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests. The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach i