Skip to main content

Open to capital: China's positive step to globalise its bond market (hindu )

China takes a positive step to globalise its bond market

China opened itself to foreign investors on Monday by liberalising rules that regulate participation in its massive bond market. The new Bond Connect scheme, which was keenly awaited for months, allows large foreign investors such as banks and pension funds to buy and sell mainland Chinese bonds through offshore accounts in Hong Kong. China’s bond market, the third largest in the world, is estimated to be over $9 trillion in value and is expected to double in size over the next five years. Yet foreign investors own less than 2% of the overall bond market, thanks to China’s policy of raising significant barriers to the free entry and exit of capital. Further, its central bank, the People’s Bank of China, of late has been tightening monetary policy to squeeze out liquidity, which has, in turn, led bond yields in China to be higher than in many developed economies. So it was no surprise that investors rushed in to make use of the scheme to trade in Chinese bonds and later announced their entry. It is noteworthy that the present move to liberalise bond investment comes after the Chinese authorities took significant steps to ease the purchase of mainland stocks by foreign investors. The Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges were connected to the Hong Kong stock exchange in 2014 and 2016, respectively, which allowed the entry of hundreds of Chinese stocks into international indices such as the MSCI. Chinese bonds can now expect similar international recognition.

Bond Connect is a significant step in China’s march towards a more open capital account. First, the inflow of foreign capital will help Beijing control the yuan. In time, the scheme will boost the borrowing potential of the Chinese sovereign as well as of corporations, while improving bond market liquidity by offering access to a wider pool of international capital. The entry of more private capital into the Chinese economy can encourage investments in economic projects as well. Also, after the inclusion of the yuan in the International Monetary Fund’s basket of currencies in 2016, the present bond reform gives a further boost to the Chinese currency. In the long run, greater participation of foreign investors in Chinese financial assets will increase the usage of the yuan, and thus aid Beijing’s efforts to internationalise the currency. This trend will also help bring more stability to China’s financial markets, known for their high levels of volatility, by improving transparency and the quality of business practices. It is worth noting that currently about 70% of bonds in China have a maturity period of less than five years, and a quarter of less than one year, as investors are wary of the risks involved in lending money over longer periods. Going forward, the challenge for Chinese authorities lies in allowing free price discovery, which can lead to painful turmoil in the short run in its bond market. It will indeed be a test of whether they have learned the right lessons from the stock market crash of 2015.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NGT terminates chairmen of pollution control boards in 10 states (downtoearth,)

Cracking the whip on 10 State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) for ad-hoc appointments, the National Green Tribunal has ordered the termination of Chairpersons of these regulatory authorities. The concerned states are Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Kerala, Rajasthan, Telangana, Haryana, Maharashtra and Manipur. The order was given last week by the principal bench of the NGT, chaired by Justice Swatanter Kumar. The recent order of June 8, 2017, comes as a follow-up to an NGT judgment given in August 2016. In that judgment, the NGT had issued directions on appointments of Chairmen and Member Secretaries of the SPCBs, emphasising on crucial roles they have in pollution control and abatement. It then specified required qualifications as well as tenure of the authorities. States were required to act on the orders within three months and frame Rules for appointment [See Box: Highlights of the NGT judgment of 2016 on criteria for SPCB chairperson appointment]. Having

High dose of Vitamin C and B3 can kill colon cancer cells: study (downtoearth)

In a first, a team of researchers has found that high doses of Vitamin C and niacin or Vitamin B3 can kill cancer stem cells. A study published in Cell Biology International showed the opposing effects of low and high dose of vitamin C and vitamin B3 on colon cancer stem cells. Led by Bipasha Bose and Sudheer Shenoy, the team found that while low doses (5-25 micromolar) of Vitamin C and B3 proliferate colon cancer stem cells, high doses (100 to 1,000 micromolar) killed cancer stem cells. Such high doses of vitamins can only be achieved through intravenous injections in colon cancer patients. The third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, colon cancer can be prevented by an intake of dietary fibre and lifestyle changes. While the next step of the researchers is to delineate the mechanisms involved in such opposing effects, they also hope to establish a therapeutic dose of Vitamin C and B3 for colon cancer stem cell therapy. “If the therapeutic dose gets validated under in vivo

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”. The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya. It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests. The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach i