Skip to main content

US states push for climate action despite country’s exit from Paris deal (downtoearth)

The month of June will remain an important phase in the history of global climate politics. While the US—the world’s largest polluter in historical and current values—yet again pulled out of climate agreement (first Kyoto Protocol and now Paris Agreement) there have been quick developments in the domestic scenario triggered as a response to the US pull-out of the climate deal.

President Trump called the Paris Agreement “unfair” to American interests, while announcing the pull-out. However, sub-national actors are carrying forward the baton of climate change action. States and cities arenow the ‘agents of change’, creating right circumstances in terms of policies and measures to address climate change; and rightly so. Climate change is a global challenge but its impacts are felt on the ground by cities, municipalities and villages. Therefore, they assume central importance in bringing about change.

The US federal structure bestows states with considerable autonomy to carry out independent decisions on various matters. In the context of climate change and energy, states can implement their trading schemes, set carbon pricing; make policies for renewable energy deployment, and set fuel-efficiency standards and building codes that can even exceed the federal standards. Cities comprise 91 per cent of the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). However, states are not sovereign units and work in collaboration with other states and at the federal level.

Earlier in the month, California, New York and Washington announced the formation of US Climate Alliance to commit to US targets of 26-28 per cent emission reduction by 2025 and meet or exceed the targets set forth in the Clean Power Plan (CPP), introduced by the Obama administration to cut emissions from power sector by an estimated 32 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030. The CPP is being repealed under the Trump administration.

READ: Trump's Executive Order sounds death knell for Paris Climate pact

Besides the above-mentioned states, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Minnesota and Virginia also supported the Alliance. Among the states, Hawaii became the first US state to legally support the Paris Agreement by enacting legal legislation despite the Federal government’s withdrawal from the treaty. The ‘we are still in’ campaign, comprising “1,219 governors, mayors, businesses, colleges and universities from across the US”, is joining forces for the first time to support the goals set out in the Paris Agreement. It is by far the largest and broadest assemblage of the US stakeholders in support of climate action. Additionally, in the 85th annual meeting of Conference of Mayors, representing more than 250 cities, support to the goals and spirit of Paris Agreement was underlined. They also committed to Paris Climate Accord, the CPP, the Clean Energy Incentive Program and other efforts that will provide cities the tools they need to combat climate change. More importantly, they vowed to approve resolution supporting a 100 per cent renewable energy goal by 2035.

In his statement announcing the US exit from the climate deal, Trump said that the US would stop implementing measures to meet its commitments under the agreement and end funding poor countries to cope with climate change. Despite that, the states and cities have recognised and rose to the challenges of climate change. The United States Climate Alliance, which was formed on June 1, 2017 to uphold the objectives of the 2015 Paris Agreement, has 13 states (out of 50) as its members and 10 others supporting it.

The official members presently comprise about 36 per cent of the population and 30.6 per cent of the US GDP. Other states also need to come forward and join the initiative. The Mayors’ initiative commitment of 100 per cent renewable energy is also scheduled for later year— by 2035 and not 2025.

At this stage, therefore, the actions taken at the sub-national level, though commendable, fall short of US targets to be fulfilled by 2025. An earlier analysis showed that at the current rate, over 60 per cent of emission reductions needed to meet the US climate targets can be met through local actions by replacing power plants with clean energy, securing large investments in energy efficiency and limiting use of natural gas.

Even with action coming from the states, the importance of sound and efficient federal policy, which can also act as strong regulatory structure, cannot be understated. However, going by the Trump’s climate agenda, this does not look like a possibility. In such circumstances, partnership and collaboration among the states becomes most crucial. States and cities have the responsibility to work towards meeting the goals of the Paris Agreement as the US had set in its climate action plan and gradually scale up the work. In the Climate Alliance, states such as Michigan and New Hampshire, that have so far refused to join, must come forward, and so do other states.

Secondly, the international community must come forward, support and mobilise the sub-national actors in their climate actions in US, instead of just slamming the Trump government for its actions. The recently concluded Africa Carbon Forum is one instant where the focus was on collaboration among African states to implement the climate action plans under Paris Agreement. However, few initiatives deserve attention. The EU calling on cities to join global covenant of mayors, banking on the initiative in the US, is a welcome step. It has also shown commitment to work closely and more actively with non-state actors. But other countries and negotiating groups, too, need to do their bit in mobilising the non-state actors for meeting and raising their climate targets and financial commitments. The G-20 meeting must also flag its support to state-level US climate actions. Under the present US administration, this is the best that can be done in fostering US efforts to address climate change.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Khar’s experimentation with Himalayan nettle brings recognition (downtoearth)

Nature never fails to surprise us. In many parts of the world, natural resources are the only source of livelihood opportunities available to people. They can be in the form of wild shrubs like Daphne papyracea and Daphne bholua (paper plant) that are used to make paper or Gossypium spp (cotton) that forms the backbone of the textile industry.

Nothing can compete with the dynamism of biological resources. Recently, Girardinia diversifolia (Himalayan nettle), a fibre-yielding plant, has become an important livelihood option for people living in the remote mountainous villages of the Hindu Kush Himalaya.

There is a community in Khar, a hamlet in Darchula district in far-western Nepal, which produces fabrics from Himalayan nettle. The fabric and the things made from it are sold in local as well as national and international markets as high-end products.

A Himalayan nettle value chain development initiative implemented by the Kailash Sacred Landscape Conservation and Development Initiati…

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”.

The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya.

It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests.

The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach it in …

New passport application rules add options for single parents, sadhus(Livemint)

Sadhus/sanyasis (Hindu ascetics) can apply for a passport with the name of their spiritual guru in lieu of their biological parents.
 New Delhi: Acknowledging a changing social milieu and its reflection in paperwork, the ministry of external affairs on Friday unveiled a series of changes in the passport application process.

The online passport application form now requires the applicant to provide the name of only one parent as opposed to both in order to enable those with single parents to apply for passports.

This comes on the heel of reports over the past two years of passport offices insisting on the father’s name in the form even if the mother is a single parent.

“A three-member committee comprising of officials of the ministry of external affairs and the ministry of women and child development was constituted to examine various issues pertaining to passport applications. These pertain to single parents, parents with adopted children and instances where they did not want the in…