Skip to main content

Notable agriculture initiatives discussed at COP 22 (downtoearth)

Agriculture is part of the solution in the fight against climate change—this was the sentiment echoed by various stakeholders gathered at COP 22 in Marrakech.

This is established by their respective climate action plans or Intended Nationally Determined Contributions. Almost 95 per cent of countries covered agriculture, and 89 per cent discussed water management in their plans. Most of the countries have considered agriculture among their adaptation or mitigation priorities to help limit global temperature rise, in line with the Paris Climate Change Agreement.

Working towards sustainable agriculture also addresses other global challenges: fighting hunger and malnutrition and sustainable management of natural resources and ecosystems. However, the progress made at COP 22 related on agriculture was very slow and the issues related to agriculture will now be discussed in May 2017.

Three new initiatives discussed at COP 22 highlight the potential in agricultural adaptation: Adaptation of African Agriculture (AAA), Global Framework on Water Scarcity and Milan Urban Food Policy Pact.

These initiatives are designed to assist small scale farmers in building their adaptive capacity, to help urban citizens in dealing with the impacts of climate change and to support countries in fulfilling their climate commitments. These action events are part of global climate action agenda, led by France and Morocco.

African Adaptation initiative

The African continent is responsible for 4% of global greenhouse gas emissions. However, agriculture in the continent has been impacted adversely by climate change.

Six of the 10 most affected countries by climate change are from Africa. Two-third of Africa’s arable land will be lost due to desertification by 2025. A decrease in agriculture yields could reach to 20 per cent by 2050, even if global warming is limited to 2°C.

According to a 2014 report by the European Commission, climate change is reducing Africa’s GDP by 1.4 per cent. This GDP value loss is largely attributed to the degradation of the agricultural sector under the effects of climate change (temperature rise, droughts and floods)

This initiative estimates that with smart, climate-sensitive agricultural practices, African annual agricultural production could increase from US $280 billion to $880 billion by 2030.

The major focus of this initiative is on soil management (soil fertility and crop fertilisation, fruit farming, rangeland management, and agroforestry, agro-ecological innovations and carbon sequestration), agricultural water control and climate risk management.

AAA already has the active support of 28 African countries, several national and private sector entities as well as of the FAO.

“In many countries, adapting to climate change and finding ways to ensure food security and nutrition are part of the same challenge,” said FAO director general, JosĂ© Graziano da Silva, noting that the widespread adoption of climate resilient practices would boost productivity and farmers’ incomes and lower food prices.

Global Framework on Water scarcity

The Global Framework on Water Scarcity supports countries in integrating climate action and sustainable water use into policies for their agricultural sectors and cross-sectoral dialogue, implement their national climate action plans, enhance the development of capacity in the climate-water-food-energy nexus, and shares knowledge and experiences with other countries.

“Higher temperatures, increasing variability of rainfall, more frequent droughts and floods, and sea level rise are all disrupting the amount of water available for crops, livestock, forests and fisheries, seriously affecting livelihoods,” said Maria Helena Semedo, FAO deputy director-general.  She emphasised that agriculture accounts for 70 per cent of global water withdrawals, and more water will be needed to produce nutritious and sufficient food for a growing population.

Several governments and knowledge and investment-related organizations have recently joined this rapidly growing multi-stakeholder platform. The Global Framework on Water Scarcity will support the implementation of the agricultural water management component of the AAA initiative.

Milan Urban Food Policy Pact

In October 2015, 132 mayors from across the world committed to the Milan Urban Food Policy Pact (MUFPP), calling for sustainable food systems in cities and adapting urban food systems against climate change. About one third of the food produced in the world for human consumption every year—approximately 1.3 billion tonnes—gets lost or wasted. Food losses and waste amounts to roughly $ 680 billion in industrialised countries and $310 billion in developing countries. FAO estimates that, without accounting for greenhouse gas emissions from land-use change, this is equivalent to an estimated carbon footprint of 3.3 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide.

This international pact is for sustainable food systems that foster the accessibility of healthy food to urban citizens, biodiversity protection and food waste reduction.

The MUFPP is building a monitoring framework process to assess the progress made by cities in achieving more sustainable food systems, and therefore in the implementation of the Pact.

The initiative explores measures that would facilitate the transition to and invest in sustainable, climate-resilient and more productive agriculture.

Comments

  1. You have mentioned here great information here. I would like to say this is a well-informed article and also beneficial article for us. Keep sharing this kind of articles, Thank you.farm crop management software

    ReplyDelete
  2. You have worked nicely with your insights. Lots of valuable data can be taken from your article. Genuinely it is a significant article for us.Microbial Enumeration Testing Services

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NGT terminates chairmen of pollution control boards in 10 states (downtoearth,)

Cracking the whip on 10 State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) for ad-hoc appointments, the National Green Tribunal has ordered the termination of Chairpersons of these regulatory authorities. The concerned states are Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Kerala, Rajasthan, Telangana, Haryana, Maharashtra and Manipur. The order was given last week by the principal bench of the NGT, chaired by Justice Swatanter Kumar. The recent order of June 8, 2017, comes as a follow-up to an NGT judgment given in August 2016. In that judgment, the NGT had issued directions on appointments of Chairmen and Member Secretaries of the SPCBs, emphasising on crucial roles they have in pollution control and abatement. It then specified required qualifications as well as tenure of the authorities. States were required to act on the orders within three months and frame Rules for appointment [See Box: Highlights of the NGT judgment of 2016 on criteria for SPCB chairperson appointment]. Having

High dose of Vitamin C and B3 can kill colon cancer cells: study (downtoearth)

In a first, a team of researchers has found that high doses of Vitamin C and niacin or Vitamin B3 can kill cancer stem cells. A study published in Cell Biology International showed the opposing effects of low and high dose of vitamin C and vitamin B3 on colon cancer stem cells. Led by Bipasha Bose and Sudheer Shenoy, the team found that while low doses (5-25 micromolar) of Vitamin C and B3 proliferate colon cancer stem cells, high doses (100 to 1,000 micromolar) killed cancer stem cells. Such high doses of vitamins can only be achieved through intravenous injections in colon cancer patients. The third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, colon cancer can be prevented by an intake of dietary fibre and lifestyle changes. While the next step of the researchers is to delineate the mechanisms involved in such opposing effects, they also hope to establish a therapeutic dose of Vitamin C and B3 for colon cancer stem cell therapy. “If the therapeutic dose gets validated under in vivo

SC asks Centre to strike a balance on Rohingya issue (.hindu)

Supreme Court orally indicates that the government should not deport Rohingya “now” as the Centre prevails over it to not record any such views in its formal order, citing “international ramifications”. The Supreme Court on Friday came close to ordering the government not to deport the Rohingya. It finally settled on merely observing that a balance should be struck between humanitarian concern for the community and the country's national security and economic interests. The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, one filed by persons within the Rohingya community, against a proposed move to deport over 40,000 Rohingya refugees. A three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, began by orally indicating that the government should not deport Rohingya “now”, but the government prevailed on the court to not pass any formal order, citing “international ramifications”. With this, the status quo continues even though the court gave the community liberty to approach i